Wikia

GTA Wiki

Changes: GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion

View source

Back to page

(adding 'closed' notice just so people know why the page is locked.)
m (Changed protection level for "GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite)))
 
(814 intermediate revisions by 42 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
::'''<font color=red>Requests for Promotion are currently closed due to a full set of active staff.</font>'''
 
 
 
Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.
 
Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.
   
 
You may apply for Rollback Rights or Administrator privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.
 
You may apply for Rollback Rights or Administrator privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.
   
Requests for Oversight and Checkuser must be done at Wikia Central (and they'll probably be declined).
+
{{RfP}}
   
'''Rollback''' is a tool that allows users to quickly revert vandalism.
+
Requests for [[w:c:help:Help:CheckUser|Checkuser]] and [[wp:Wikipedia:Revision deletion|Revision Delete]] must be done at Community Central (and they will probably be declined).
  +
  +
'''Patrollers '''are given the''' Rollback''' tool that allows users to quickly revert vandalism.
   
 
'''Administrators''' have the power to block and ban users, protect pages, move images, and delete pages and images, in addition to rollback.
 
'''Administrators''' have the power to block and ban users, protect pages, move images, and delete pages and images, in addition to rollback.
   
To qualify for rollback rights, editors must have been active for two months with no rules violations. Rollbackers must receive a 60% 'yes' percentage to be promoted.
+
To qualify for rollback rights, editors must have been active for two months with no rules violations. Rollbackers must receive a 60% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Users who apply within three months of joining will face a three month probationary period. This may also apply in extreme situations such as inexperience or users who were previously demoted. At the end of the three months a review will be made by Bureaucrats and Administrators to determine whether or not the user will retain their rights.
   
To qualify for administrator rights, editors must have been active for four months with no rules violations. Administrators must receive a 70% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Those applying for adminship will likely be asked questions on how they deal with certain situations. This is to see if a user has the capabilities of being an administrator.
+
To qualify for administrator rights, editors must have been active patrollers for four months with no rule violations. Administrators must receive a 70% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Those applying for adminship will likely be asked questions on how they deal with certain situations. This is to see if a user has the capabilities of being an administrator.
   
 
Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.
 
Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.
   
When applying for promotion, a ''community vote'' will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at sysop discretion.
+
When applying for promotion, a ''community vote'' will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at bureaucrat discretion. Only bureaucrats should close votes.
   
 
Application users who are caught tampering with other users votes, such as changing a no to a yes, will have their request closed immediately.
 
Application users who are caught tampering with other users votes, such as changing a no to a yes, will have their request closed immediately.
Line 27: Line 25:
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2011-12]]
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2011-12]]
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2013]]
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2013]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Jan 2014 Administrator Election]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2014]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2014-15]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests Early 2015]]
   
 
==Active requests==
 
==Active requests==
   
==Inactive requests==
+
==Inactive Requests==
  +
===Myth hunter - Patroller===
  +
'''''Closed as successful subject to probation by''''' [[User:Leon Davis|Leo68]] ([[User talk:Leon Davis|talk]]) 16:43, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
  +
Hello everyone, I am Myth hunter and I want apply for Patroller position on this wiki. I am regularly active here(Not edit regularly because I was a little busy this month but visit the wiki everyday). Chat moderating is also a part of Patroller and I am regularly available at chat. I have a good experience of being a patroller. I know how to use the tools. So, I would like to be promoted to protect the wiki from vandalism. - [[User:Myth hunter|Myth hunter]]([[User talk:Myth hunter|Talk]])
  +
====Votes====
  +
*'''Yes (probation)'''- [[User:Leon Davis|Leo68]] ([[User talk:Leon Davis|talk]]) 15:25, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*'''Yes''' - [http://gta.wikia.com/User_talk:Marec2 Marec2] 17:46, April 21, 2015.
  +
  +
*'''Yes''' - [[Image:Signature.png|105px|link=User:AndreEagle17|AndreEagle17]] ([[User talk:AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">stalk</span>]]/[[User blog:AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">blog</span>]]) 15:31, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*'''Yes '''- [[Image:Smashbro8-Sig-pt1.png|90px|link=User:Smashbro8|Smashbro8]] ([[Image:Smashbro8-Sig-pt2.png|50px|link=User talk:Smashbro8|Talk]]) 16:02, April 21, 2015 (UTC)Smashbro8
  +
*'''Yes (probation)''' - [[User:SJWalker|SJWalker]] ([[User talk:SJWalker|talk]]) 15:33, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*'''Positive (probation) - '''{{Monkeypolice188/Sig}} 15:38, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*'''Yes (probation)''' - [[User:LS11sVaultBoy|LS11sVaultBoy]] ([[User talk:LS11sVaultBoy|Talk]]) 15:50, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*'''Yes (probation)''' - [[User:DocVinewood|DocVinewood]] ([[User talk:DocVinewood|talk]]) 16:23, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
   
::'''<font color=red>Requests for Promotion are currently closed due to a full set of active staff.</font>'''
+
====Comments====
  +
*You are a good user but you once had an infinite ban that was lifted. Yes, you have changed since September which is why it is not a no. [[User:Leon Davis|Leo68]] ([[User talk:Leon Davis|talk]]) 15:26, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
**Even 558 got blocked once. [[Image:Signature.png|105px|link=User:AndreEagle17|AndreEagle17]] ([[User talk:AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">stalk</span>]]/[[User blog:AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">blog</span>]]) 15:32, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
**Oh, I forgot about to tell about that ban in September. It was lifted the next day I was blocked. LSVault blocked me because I added some information on a wiki from GTA Wiki. At that time I didn't know about the plagiarism rule. I removed the info I added and talked to Vault and my block was lifted.[[User:Myth hunter|Myth hunter]]
  +
*Of all the Myths wiki representatives, Hunter is the only one who actually helps this wiki, by editing articles and reporting vandals, I think he deserves the spot. [[Image:Signature.png|105px|link=User:AndreEagle17|AndreEagle17]] ([[User talk:AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">stalk</span>]]/[[User blog:AndreEagle17|<span style="color:black">blog</span>]]) 15:31, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*I've thought about it, and I'm putting my faith in you. However, taking into account what Leon said about your previous ban, I think probation would be best. [[User:SJWalker|SJWalker]] ([[User talk:SJWalker|talk]]) 15:33, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*I agree with Sam changing to a probation vote. It has helped already, Andre is a great example of how well it has worked. [[User:Leon Davis|Leo68]] ([[User talk:Leon Davis|talk]]) 15:35, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*Hunter is a very good contributer, however, I never saw the events Leon was on about, so I can't say YES without a probation. {{Monkeypolice188/Sig}} 15:38, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*Seeing the work Myth has put in here, Myth deserves the job to me. He is also one of the few non-staff users who have helped change the community of this wiki, which is one of the most important things to look at when applying for promotion. [[Image:Smashbro8-Sig-pt1.png|90px|link=User:Smashbro8|Smashbro8]] ([[Image:Smashbro8-Sig-pt2.png|50px|link=User talk:Smashbro8|Talk]]) 16:02, April 21, 2015 (UTC)Smashbro8
  +
*I think you could be a good patroller, but I recommend probation first. If you're active and keep your good work I'm sure you will get the position. [[User:DocVinewood|DocVinewood]] ([[User talk:DocVinewood|talk]]) 16:23, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:37, April 23, 2015

Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.

You may apply for Rollback Rights or Administrator privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.

RFPNOVacancy

There are currently

no
staff
positions open.

LockedPage


Requests for Checkuser and Revision Delete must be done at Community Central (and they will probably be declined).

Patrollers are given the Rollback tool that allows users to quickly revert vandalism.

Administrators have the power to block and ban users, protect pages, move images, and delete pages and images, in addition to rollback.

To qualify for rollback rights, editors must have been active for two months with no rules violations. Rollbackers must receive a 60% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Users who apply within three months of joining will face a three month probationary period. This may also apply in extreme situations such as inexperience or users who were previously demoted. At the end of the three months a review will be made by Bureaucrats and Administrators to determine whether or not the user will retain their rights.

To qualify for administrator rights, editors must have been active patrollers for four months with no rule violations. Administrators must receive a 70% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Those applying for adminship will likely be asked questions on how they deal with certain situations. This is to see if a user has the capabilities of being an administrator.

Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.

When applying for promotion, a community vote will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at bureaucrat discretion. Only bureaucrats should close votes.

Application users who are caught tampering with other users votes, such as changing a no to a yes, will have their request closed immediately.

Please submit your requests at the top of the "Active requests" page subsection.

Requests where the voting has finished can be found at

Active requestsEdit

Inactive RequestsEdit

Myth hunter - PatrollerEdit

Closed as successful subject to probation by Leo68 (talk) 16:43, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

Hello everyone, I am Myth hunter and I want apply for Patroller position on this wiki. I am regularly active here(Not edit regularly because I was a little busy this month but visit the wiki everyday). Chat moderating is also a part of Patroller and I am regularly available at chat. I have a good experience of being a patroller. I know how to use the tools. So, I would like to be promoted to protect the wiki from vandalism. - Myth hunter(Talk)

VotesEdit

  • Yes (probation)- Leo68 (talk) 15:25, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes - Marec2 17:46, April 21, 2015.
  • Yes - Signature (talk/stalk/blog) 15:31, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes - Smashbro8-Sig-pt1 (Smashbro8-Sig-pt2) 16:02, April 21, 2015 (UTC)Smashbro8
  • Yes (probation) - SJWalker (talk) 15:33, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Positive (probation) - Monkeypolice188-Signature LSPD Loudhailer-V-render StunGun-GTA5-ingame 15:38, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes (probation) - LS11sVaultBoy (Talk) 15:50, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes (probation) - DocVinewood (talk) 16:23, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

  • You are a good user but you once had an infinite ban that was lifted. Yes, you have changed since September which is why it is not a no. Leo68 (talk) 15:26, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Even 558 got blocked once. Signature (talk/stalk/blog) 15:32, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
    • Oh, I forgot about to tell about that ban in September. It was lifted the next day I was blocked. LSVault blocked me because I added some information on a wiki from GTA Wiki. At that time I didn't know about the plagiarism rule. I removed the info I added and talked to Vault and my block was lifted.Myth hunter
  • Of all the Myths wiki representatives, Hunter is the only one who actually helps this wiki, by editing articles and reporting vandals, I think he deserves the spot. Signature (talk/stalk/blog) 15:31, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • I've thought about it, and I'm putting my faith in you. However, taking into account what Leon said about your previous ban, I think probation would be best. SJWalker (talk) 15:33, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • I agree with Sam changing to a probation vote. It has helped already, Andre is a great example of how well it has worked. Leo68 (talk) 15:35, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Hunter is a very good contributer, however, I never saw the events Leon was on about, so I can't say YES without a probation. Monkeypolice188-Signature LSPD Loudhailer-V-render StunGun-GTA5-ingame 15:38, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Seeing the work Myth has put in here, Myth deserves the job to me. He is also one of the few non-staff users who have helped change the community of this wiki, which is one of the most important things to look at when applying for promotion. Smashbro8-Sig-pt1 (Smashbro8-Sig-pt2) 16:02, April 21, 2015 (UTC)Smashbro8
  • I think you could be a good patroller, but I recommend probation first. If you're active and keep your good work I'm sure you will get the position. DocVinewood (talk) 16:23, April 21, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki