(Added the full detail for admin nomination) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Users who have been nominiated for promotion (with <nowiki>{{promote}}</nowiki> in their user page) should be discussed here. |
Users who have been nominiated for promotion (with <nowiki>{{promote}}</nowiki> in their user page) should be discussed here. |
||
| − | Don't forget that any member can act as a moderator, cleaning up content. It is the members who act as such who will be more likely to be accepted as a [[Sysop]], which gives them extra tools to help out. |
+ | Don't forget that any member can act as a moderator, cleaning up content. It is the members who act as such who will be more likely to be accepted as a [[Sysop]], which gives them extra tools to help out. There is no point having an administrator that does not add content, because that is what GTW is all about. |
| + | Admin nomination procedure: |
||
| − | There is no point having an administrator that does not add content, because that is what GTW is all about. |
||
| + | #Member is nominated (or nominates themselves) to become an admin |
||
| + | #If they were nominated by somebody else, they need to agree to the nomination |
||
| + | #A [[Bureaucrat]] will then approve the nomination if he thinks it should go ahead |
||
| + | #Questions will be asked to the candidate, who must answer them |
||
| + | #Users can comment on whether they think the candidate should become an admin or not.. AND WHY |
||
| + | #After a few days or couple of weeks, a bureaucrat will close the nomination and either approve or deny the application |
||
----<!--- please discuss individual nominations below this line ---> |
----<!--- please discuss individual nominations below this line ---> |
||
| Line 10: | Line 16: | ||
I nominated myself, as I thought, "Meh, what the heck? It's worth a shot!" [[User:Carl "CJ" Johnson|Carl "CJ" Johnson]] 21:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
I nominated myself, as I thought, "Meh, what the heck? It's worth a shot!" [[User:Carl "CJ" Johnson|Carl "CJ" Johnson]] 21:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :Thanks for nominating yourself. The procedue for community-approved administrators is simple - firstly you answer some questions that I'll put below, then everybody can reply here with their opinions on whether you should or should not become an admin. A decision will be made by the existing admin team in a few days time. I know you nominated yourself for fun, but I think it's worth a try. It'll help us decide a proper system for future admins - so your help here would be appreciated. |
||
| + | :<br> |
||
| + | :If you don't get through this time, we'll give you some tips on how you can improve and perhaps try again in a couple of months. But if you do get through, you'll become a member of the Grand Theft Wiki admin team. [[User:Xenon|Xenon]] 17:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ===Questions for the candidate=== |
||
| + | Carl "CJ" Johnson, please answer these questions below (answer after the question). If anybody would like to ask another question, feel free. |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Why do you want to become an admin on Grand Theft Wiki?''' |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Do you have any experience on other wikis, or being an admin or moderator on any other sites?''' |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''What do you think the job of a SysOp is on Grand Theft Wiki?''' |
||
| + | |||
| + | ===Comments=== |
||
| + | All members can add comments here, but please say WHY you think the candidate should or should not become an admin. Please remember to sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Support''' |
||
| + | *People who agree with the nomination, comment here |
||
| + | '''Oppose''' |
||
| + | *People who do not agree with the nomination, comment here |
||
Revision as of 17:16, 22 March 2007
Users who have been nominiated for promotion (with {{promote}} in their user page) should be discussed here.
Don't forget that any member can act as a moderator, cleaning up content. It is the members who act as such who will be more likely to be accepted as a Sysop, which gives them extra tools to help out. There is no point having an administrator that does not add content, because that is what GTW is all about.
Admin nomination procedure:
- Member is nominated (or nominates themselves) to become an admin
- If they were nominated by somebody else, they need to agree to the nomination
- A Bureaucrat will then approve the nomination if he thinks it should go ahead
- Questions will be asked to the candidate, who must answer them
- Users can comment on whether they think the candidate should become an admin or not.. AND WHY
- After a few days or couple of weeks, a bureaucrat will close the nomination and either approve or deny the application
Carl "CJ" Johnson
I nominated myself, as I thought, "Meh, what the heck? It's worth a shot!" Carl "CJ" Johnson 21:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for nominating yourself. The procedue for community-approved administrators is simple - firstly you answer some questions that I'll put below, then everybody can reply here with their opinions on whether you should or should not become an admin. A decision will be made by the existing admin team in a few days time. I know you nominated yourself for fun, but I think it's worth a try. It'll help us decide a proper system for future admins - so your help here would be appreciated.
- If you don't get through this time, we'll give you some tips on how you can improve and perhaps try again in a couple of months. But if you do get through, you'll become a member of the Grand Theft Wiki admin team. Xenon 17:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Carl "CJ" Johnson, please answer these questions below (answer after the question). If anybody would like to ask another question, feel free.
Why do you want to become an admin on Grand Theft Wiki?
Do you have any experience on other wikis, or being an admin or moderator on any other sites?
What do you think the job of a SysOp is on Grand Theft Wiki?
Comments
All members can add comments here, but please say WHY you think the candidate should or should not become an admin. Please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~
Support
- People who agree with the nomination, comment here
Oppose
- People who do not agree with the nomination, comment here