I think this page no longer qualifies as a stub, I would remove the stub at the top, but i'd like permission before I or someone else does.
'Modifications' section on GTA V cars, is it really necessary?
Okay so it's fine to have a modification section under the GTA San Andreas section of a page, because the customisation on that game was pretty limited. But do you really think GTA V vehicles need a 'Modifications' section? Since the customisation is so extensive in GTA V, I think it's pointless because every article about a vehicle would just have a super long unneeded list of modifications. I mean this one has about 5 listed. What about Rims? Suspension? Tire smoke colour? You get the point. I hope... I just think it should be removed completely. Sammyrock0087 (talk) 18:37, March 16, 2014 (UTC)
I think the vehicles that have modification features like exhaust, bumpers, roof or hood etc. should have the "Modifications" section. Vehicles that have the usual like engine upgrades and respraying features should not have the section. Ice finn (talk) 19:08, March 16, 2014 (UTC)
I'll agree with Ice finn. You really don't need to list all the rims and respraying options for every single vehicle - or if you really want to, make it a hideable list. Just non-usual modifications such as chassis, bumpers, body extensions or such. Jarppi (talk) 09:42, April 2, 2014 (UTC)