GTA Wiki

Help required: categories

Hi everyone, please help us by filling out this form!


We are determining how players best define and/or differentiate the terms "game modes", "missions" and "activities". This will be used to help us develop a clear and logical category tree to house articles related to this type of content.


Thank you in advance for help!

READ MORE

GTA Wiki
GTA Wiki
19,871
pages
(been meaning to add this for a while...)
 
(37 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Bureaucrat}}<br />
 
 
{{Clr}}
 
{{Clr}}
 
{{userboxtop}}
 
{{userboxtop}}
  +
{{Template:Userbox Staff Member Time|was|a|full time bureaucrat|2|years|10|months|0|days}}
{{Userbox| border-c=#000| info-c=#000| info-fc=#fff| info-s=9| id=[[File:Anon.jpg|40px]]|info=GTAWiki is a videogame. <br /> <strong>I am the final boss.</strong>}}
 
{{Userbox:MonoBook}}
 
 
{{Userbox:GTASA}}
 
{{Userbox:GTASA}}
 
{{Userbox |border-c=#000|border-s=2 |id-c=#000|id-s=14 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#FFF |info-fc=#000|id=[[Image:GTAIV.png|55px]] |info='''This user thinks [[Grand Theft Auto IV|GTA IV]] is the <u>worst</u> GTA game'''}}
 
{{Userbox |border-c=#000|border-s=2 |id-c=#000|id-s=14 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#FFF |info-fc=#000|id=[[Image:GTAIV.png|55px]] |info='''This user thinks [[Grand Theft Auto IV|GTA IV]] is the <u>worst</u> GTA game'''}}
 
{{Userbox:Tommy}}
 
{{Userbox:Tommy}}
{{Userbox |border-c=black |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=black |info-s=8 |info-fc=silver |id=[[File:NikoLiberty.jpg|70px]] |info=This user thinks that Niko Bellic is the <u>worst</u> protagonist.}}
+
{{Userbox |border-c=black |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=black |info-s=8 |info-fc=silver |id=[[File:NikoDerp.jpg|70px]] |info=This user thinks that Niko Bellic is the <u>worst</u> protagonist.}}
 
{{Userbox:NoMyths}}
 
{{Userbox:NoMyths}}
 
{{Userbox:USA}}
 
{{Userbox:USA}}
  +
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#000 |id-s=14 |id-fc=#FFF |info-c=black | info-s=8 |info-fc=#33CC00 |id=[[File:John Deere Logo.jpg|60px]] | info=This ol' user sure is a redneck, boy howdy!}}
{{Userbox:Atheist}}
 
  +
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=2 |id-c=#FFF |id-s=12 |id-fc=white |info-c=#FFF |info-s=8 |info-fc=#000 |id=[[File:Atheist Symbol.jpg|35px]] |info=This user is an '''[[wikipedia:Atheism|Atheist]].'''}}
   
 
{{userboxbottom}}
 
{{userboxbottom}}
   
  +
Bureaucrat from 2011-2014, and a few months in 2015. Currently very sporadically active on this wiki.
{{Q|Because to win in the game of football, or life, you have to annihilate errything in your path... in a blind rage.|BJ Smith}}
 
   
  +
==Why I stepped down==
==The problem with being a bureaucrat==
 
   
  +
I never really had the knowledge of the GTA series to be a great content editor. I played and loved Vice City and San Andreas, and most of my best edits were to VC and SA related pages. I didn't care for GTA3, probably because I started with Vice City and compared to it, GTA3 seemed really primitive with the small car selection, simple missions and silent protagonist. I hated the bleak angsty aesthetic and the driving physics of GTA4, and never played GTAs 1 and 2.
If a bureaucrat edits only occasionally, they become sort of the wise man on top of the mountain who advises the pilgrims and occasionally descends to set right what has gone wrong. But bureaucrats are supposed to be responsible for their wikis - especially on such an active wiki as this one.
 
   
  +
I got the job because the wiki was rebuilding in the wake of the [[GTA Wiki:Community split|community split]]. A guy named WikisEditor somehow knew about my work as a bureaucrat on Bully Wiki and invited me (and my fellow bureaucrat Messi1983) to GTA Wiki not because of my content writing but because of my administrative knowledge. We put the wiki back together, got rules written and a fully functional staff promoted and trained.
If a bureaucrat edits every day, he becomes the hardass busybody cop that everyone hates, and his presence can become counterproductive. Especially when it comes to enforcing important but unpopular policies.
 
   
  +
And with that done, there wasn't much for me to do.
==On the subject of the [[GTA Wiki:Image Policy|Image Policy]]==
 
   
  +
Every so often something requiring bureaucratish knowledge would happen, like the Dodo/Sasquatch dispute or the January 2014 Administrator Elections. But aside from the occasional Big Thing, all I was doing on GTA Wiki was occasionally reverting vandalism or blocking someone, and enforcing the image policy. And enforcing the image policy is tedious, takes a lot of time, and makes you unpopular with editors who don't see the point.
If you're looking at this page there's a good chance it's because I've warned you to follow the image policy.
 
   
  +
When GTAV came out at first I thought it was awesome. Then I suddenly lost all interest in it. I think it was in the lead-up to a heist where you have to store a getaway vehicle... I don't know. I found that so annoying that I just stopped playing and never started again. And when I realized that GTAV wasn't as great as I thought it was, I began to think it was time for me to leave the wiki.
The image policy is ''not'' hard to understand. Read the directions. Follow the directions. I ''cannot'' help you if you don't understand after reading the directions, because they are so incredibly simple that I haven't any idea how to help someone who doesn't understand them. There is no rule saying you have to be allowed to upload images and there are plenty of users who can do it right.
 
   
  +
Funny thing is, it's hard to let go if only because it's human nature to hang onto power, even if it's a power as insignificant as bureaucrat on a wiki, and even if we're rarely using it and not enjoying it when we do. Dan, The Tom and I each have stepped down as bureaucrat before, then gone back and gotten ourselves repromoted - we ended up making a rule to keep us from doing that again, and since we each did that once it kind of balances out.
Back in the pre-Wikia New Look days, images weren't much of a problem. But now that wikis show the user who uploaded the image alongside the image, and that wikis which allow badges award them for uploading large amounts of images, most Wikia wikis are chock full of duplicate, low quality and/or irrelevant images. That's why the image policy has to be harsh and why I'm unsympathetic to users having trouble with it - because the constant influx of bad and useless images means that strict administration is necessary.
 
   
==On the subject of myths==
+
==Why I don't like the GTA games anymore==
   
  +
Because fuck angst that's why. You heard me.
To explain the "nuance" of the position this wiki takes on myths related content.
 
   
  +
In all seriousness, when I play a game and beat that game, I expect the protagonist to win too. I'm not a fan of deconstructions and aesops - if I'm playing a GTA game and my character doesn't end up a filthy rich crime god at the end of the game a la Tommy and CJ, I feel like the whole game was a waste of time. See also: Red Dead Redemption, where I felt that the ending ruined the entire game.
It isn't that discussion of myths itself is offensive or too far off topic. The problem is that myth related articles tend to be almost completely uncontrollable. First, for whatever reason, they're major vandalism magnets. Second, even if the vandalism is kept ahead of, they tend to fill up with speculation, useless details, and information that isn't just wrong, but "stupid-wrong", e.g. the guy who was convinced that Bigfoot was on the doors of the police cars in GTAV, and that that proved he existed in GTA:SA. Lastly it tends to attract editors who are interested in proving myths rather than editing about them neutrally. They fill up the myth articles with ruminations, personal stories, incorrect information, and modded images masquerading as "proof". If this were Wikipedia, you could call them Single Purpose Accounts and POV-Pushers editing with a Conflict Of Interest. When thwarted, they regularly go full vandal, forcing staff to block and clean up after them.
 
   
  +
I guess the thing about overly realistic realism applies too, but other people have said it far better and in more detail than I'm about to.
It is better all around to have an entirely separate Myths wiki, with rules and policies specifically tailored to people who want to write about myths, and simply forbid editing about myths and direct interested editors elsewhere on this wiki.
 
   
  +
==A thought about administrators quitting==
==Why didn't you like the GTA4 era games?==
 
#The setting was so grim and bleak and miserable I found myself unable to enjoy exploring it
 
#The major characters were void of either sympathetic personality traits or motivations
 
#The sluggish unresponsive driving mechanics
 
#Awful radio station selection. Three rap, no metal, and rock spread across 2 stations and mixed in with other stuff?
 
   
  +
Something that's come up as of early 2015 is the amount of turnover we've had with administrators. That is to say, people get promoted to administrator and after a while their edits start tapering off, they lose interest in the wiki and either just go inactive or resign.
==Alternate accounts==
 
  +
*[[User:McJeff Alternate]]: Account for public terminals and occasional spading
 
  +
The reason that is, is because being an administrator (or bureaucrat) is really not all that much fun.
*[[User:McJeff Chat]]: User account specifically for using the chatroom (as I edit with the Monobook skin I can't access the chatroom under this account)
 
  +
*[[User:Jeff the Bot]]: Dormant user account in case I ever register to run a bot
 
  +
Admins and b'crats don't get to do much normal editing because they're busy doing the busywork - watching recent changes, moving images around, performing dispute resolution, that kind of stuff. Especially if they take a hard line on things like images or civility, administrators become unpopular with general editors.
  +
  +
The other thing is that it's human nature to gradually lose interest in things. Especially with younger editors, they'll get involved in things at school, or end up with responsibilities they didn't have when they started editing (one of our b'crats resigned because of army commitments) and that leads to them stopping editing. But even older editors lose interest. Remember the Community Split, how a bunch of our then-best editors went off to Grand Theft Wiki? Well, as of mid 2016, Grand Theft Wiki is dead. The reason I bring that up isn't to bash Grand Theft Wiki, but as evidence that it's not just on this wiki where such things happen.
  +
  +
People lose interest in things. I've lost interest in the GTA series entirely by this point, and my continuing interest in this wiki is purely in the political/inner workings of it. And even that is waning, since I retired before most of the active staff started editing. The fact that we have administrators and bureaucrats quit doesn't mean there's anything wrong with GTA Wiki.
  +
  +
==A thought on strict rules on demoting staff for inactivity==
  +
  +
It's stupid and shouldn't be done.
  +
  +
When Dan/Messi, The Tom and I were the b-crats here on the wiki, we tirelessly ignored requests from younger users who said we NEEEEEDED a full roster of staff on the wiki CONSTANTLY because we needed to always have someone on hand to revert vandalism IMMEDIATELY and it wasn't FAIR to the people who weren't admins yet.
  +
  +
So as soon as VaultBoy became a bureaucrat he made a bunch of terrible rules about activity. VaultBoy was a great admin but not a good bureaucrat - I'd like to be a lot harsher on that matter but I don't want to break the rules. Nonetheless remember that he unblocked a friend of his against the entire community's consensus to get a promotion on GTA Myths Wiki and unilaterally changed a bunch of rules he didn't like. Even though he's gone, the wiki is suffering from the policies he rammed through, either with a vote or without.
  +
  +
And now we have bureaucrats and administrators quitting and unquitting on a regular basis and causing pointless drama and noticeboard clutter. Also, we have a half empty staff roster because with GTA V having been out for years and no news about a GTA VI yet, there's a lot less activity on the wiki and less need for staff.

Latest revision as of 21:56, 17 August 2019

Administrator This user was a full time bureaucrat for 2 years, 10 months, and 0 days.


SA(Black) This user thinks San Andreas is the best GTA game
GTAIV This user thinks GTA IV is the worst GTA game
Artwork-GTAVC-TommyVercetti This user thinks Tommy Vercetti is the best protagonist
NikoDerp This user thinks that Niko Bellic is the worst protagonist.
Untitled621 This user doesn't believe in any GTA myths
Flag of the United States This user is proud to be American
John Deere Logo This ol' user sure is a redneck, boy howdy!
Atheist Symbol This user is an Atheist.

Bureaucrat from 2011-2014, and a few months in 2015. Currently very sporadically active on this wiki.

Why I stepped down

I never really had the knowledge of the GTA series to be a great content editor. I played and loved Vice City and San Andreas, and most of my best edits were to VC and SA related pages. I didn't care for GTA3, probably because I started with Vice City and compared to it, GTA3 seemed really primitive with the small car selection, simple missions and silent protagonist. I hated the bleak angsty aesthetic and the driving physics of GTA4, and never played GTAs 1 and 2.

I got the job because the wiki was rebuilding in the wake of the community split. A guy named WikisEditor somehow knew about my work as a bureaucrat on Bully Wiki and invited me (and my fellow bureaucrat Messi1983) to GTA Wiki not because of my content writing but because of my administrative knowledge. We put the wiki back together, got rules written and a fully functional staff promoted and trained.

And with that done, there wasn't much for me to do.

Every so often something requiring bureaucratish knowledge would happen, like the Dodo/Sasquatch dispute or the January 2014 Administrator Elections. But aside from the occasional Big Thing, all I was doing on GTA Wiki was occasionally reverting vandalism or blocking someone, and enforcing the image policy. And enforcing the image policy is tedious, takes a lot of time, and makes you unpopular with editors who don't see the point.

When GTAV came out at first I thought it was awesome. Then I suddenly lost all interest in it. I think it was in the lead-up to a heist where you have to store a getaway vehicle... I don't know. I found that so annoying that I just stopped playing and never started again. And when I realized that GTAV wasn't as great as I thought it was, I began to think it was time for me to leave the wiki.

Funny thing is, it's hard to let go if only because it's human nature to hang onto power, even if it's a power as insignificant as bureaucrat on a wiki, and even if we're rarely using it and not enjoying it when we do. Dan, The Tom and I each have stepped down as bureaucrat before, then gone back and gotten ourselves repromoted - we ended up making a rule to keep us from doing that again, and since we each did that once it kind of balances out.

Why I don't like the GTA games anymore

Because fuck angst that's why. You heard me.

In all seriousness, when I play a game and beat that game, I expect the protagonist to win too. I'm not a fan of deconstructions and aesops - if I'm playing a GTA game and my character doesn't end up a filthy rich crime god at the end of the game a la Tommy and CJ, I feel like the whole game was a waste of time. See also: Red Dead Redemption, where I felt that the ending ruined the entire game.

I guess the thing about overly realistic realism applies too, but other people have said it far better and in more detail than I'm about to.

A thought about administrators quitting

Something that's come up as of early 2015 is the amount of turnover we've had with administrators. That is to say, people get promoted to administrator and after a while their edits start tapering off, they lose interest in the wiki and either just go inactive or resign.

The reason that is, is because being an administrator (or bureaucrat) is really not all that much fun.

Admins and b'crats don't get to do much normal editing because they're busy doing the busywork - watching recent changes, moving images around, performing dispute resolution, that kind of stuff. Especially if they take a hard line on things like images or civility, administrators become unpopular with general editors.

The other thing is that it's human nature to gradually lose interest in things. Especially with younger editors, they'll get involved in things at school, or end up with responsibilities they didn't have when they started editing (one of our b'crats resigned because of army commitments) and that leads to them stopping editing. But even older editors lose interest. Remember the Community Split, how a bunch of our then-best editors went off to Grand Theft Wiki? Well, as of mid 2016, Grand Theft Wiki is dead. The reason I bring that up isn't to bash Grand Theft Wiki, but as evidence that it's not just on this wiki where such things happen.

People lose interest in things. I've lost interest in the GTA series entirely by this point, and my continuing interest in this wiki is purely in the political/inner workings of it. And even that is waning, since I retired before most of the active staff started editing. The fact that we have administrators and bureaucrats quit doesn't mean there's anything wrong with GTA Wiki.

A thought on strict rules on demoting staff for inactivity

It's stupid and shouldn't be done.

When Dan/Messi, The Tom and I were the b-crats here on the wiki, we tirelessly ignored requests from younger users who said we NEEEEEDED a full roster of staff on the wiki CONSTANTLY because we needed to always have someone on hand to revert vandalism IMMEDIATELY and it wasn't FAIR to the people who weren't admins yet.

So as soon as VaultBoy became a bureaucrat he made a bunch of terrible rules about activity. VaultBoy was a great admin but not a good bureaucrat - I'd like to be a lot harsher on that matter but I don't want to break the rules. Nonetheless remember that he unblocked a friend of his against the entire community's consensus to get a promotion on GTA Myths Wiki and unilaterally changed a bunch of rules he didn't like. Even though he's gone, the wiki is suffering from the policies he rammed through, either with a vote or without.

And now we have bureaucrats and administrators quitting and unquitting on a regular basis and causing pointless drama and noticeboard clutter. Also, we have a half empty staff roster because with GTA V having been out for years and no news about a GTA VI yet, there's a lot less activity on the wiki and less need for staff.