GTA Wiki
Register
Advertisement
GTA Wiki
19,723
pages


Archive 1 - Archive 2 - Archive 3 - Archive 4 - Archive 5 - Archive 6 - Archive 7 - Archive 8 - Archive 9 - Archive 10 - Archive 11 - Archive 12 - Archive 13 - Archive 14 - Archive 15

Davids[]

We are Curious as to why We've seen all of the Davids that worked on the Grand Theft auto series are being edited, Me and a few friends are looking at cars and such when we saw that you've been editing them, may we know why? again to restate we are just curious —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:WaltuhWhie (talkcontribs) Please remember to sign your talk page messages with ~~~~.

Bombushka[]

I was wondering if i could add in the trivia section of the bombushka about how the bombushka is surprisingly quick in reverse, which may lead to the possibility of a reverse take off, i was wanting clearance before i make a (major to me) edit to a vehicle page WaltuhWhie (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Why you doin this?[]

You know what I am talking about. - Convoyer (talk) 18:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

RE:[]

Hello, VaultBoy.

Since I am being pressured on over the "unneccesary descriptions", let me at least try to defend my position because it seems that I am on my own over this "issue".

I am seriously annoyed that because of one person, SuperAusten64, who decided to complain over an "unneccessary verbose" over the Interceptor (that I did not back then because it was there since the early days, not to mention he was mainly complaining why we still call it "Interceptor", BTW), we have to revert pretty much anything it was done to this day considering I was the only one trying to keep up with a standard that was left abandoned from like 2014-2015, without even anyone having issues over my actions. I understand not everyone should be checking up every edit going on, unless it was interfering with the MoS we have.

I understand Monk always has neat ideas to improve the wiki (always, I would say), but as a way to clash with my contributions (which are apparently sub-par) is pretty much an annoyance. Having to clean that up is one thing, but removing descriptions regarding vehicle's color and weaponry is another thing (and yes, the F-160 Raiju was a perfect example. Don't make me fix that again. Ever).

Now, I don't know if you all are aware of my current intentions, but if I have the slim possibility to edit without any major issues (because I am a major issue, apparently), my planning would be to keep the descriptions as minimal as possible, so I could balance things up. I understand most of the descriptions back then are extensively long and I plan to remove as much as I could (if removing details about materials and body lines even count), but if that is not a possibility, then I dunno. I don't have "brilliant, clever ideas to improve the wiki", as Monk would ever do.

As a different matter, if any of you ever feel like I am not up with any of this, feel free to demote and block me whenever if neccessary. At this point, I am already stressed with the fact I am isolated from everything and having to adopt this "rogue" behaviour, which is against the simplest standard of being a staff member, not to mention I cannot think clearly to come up with a better proposal. Hence why I choose to message you rather than bringing this up on the CN.

That's all. Have a nice day. Body Armor Android SWAT Cam F Torpedo Android Dispatch Data Files 00:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Patroller/ Rollbacker.[]

what are the requirements to attain this ? do i have to have a certain edits, posts, etc ? respond whenever u can im rlly not good with these talk pages.

Discord invite link expired[]

Hi, the Discord invite link that you have sent me a couple of weeks ago has expired. Could you send me a new one? Thanks. Radishman85 (talk) 18:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Advertisement