(→RE) |
(→Note) |
||
| (43 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | ==Welcome== |
||
| − | Leave a message. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | ==LEAVE A MESSAGE== |
||
| + | ---- |
||
| + | ==GTW== |
||
| − | ==Chinatown Wars is non-canon.== |
||
| + | Don't forget to join us at our new [http://www.grandtheftwiki.com website]. [[User:A-Dust|A-Dust]] 00:15, October 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | This game is not part of the GTA IV era, it exits on it's own, most poll results say so. |
||
| − | |||
| − | :We have no idea weather it is canon or not. "Most Poll Results" is not something to justify these edits. Chinatown wars may well be canon, we just don't know and Rockstar may not confirm weather it is or is not. So we can't jump to conclusions here. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 04:03, July 29, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | :It will always be non-canon to me because it is nothing like GTA IV and it is too unrealistic |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==Edit Warring== |
||
| − | |||
| − | I could not help but notice the edit way you are having with [[User:Olivercooke]] on the [[Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars]] page. I have protected the page to prevent if from escalating. I will not take any action, due to the fact that this seems to be your first edit war, however if this happens again then action will be taken. If you have anything to ask then [[User talk:Chimpso|ask me]]. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 06:26, July 29, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :A wise guy? No, i'm just trying to tell you that edit warring on this wiki is wrong and unnaceptable. You and Oliver seem to be on decent terms now, but if this happens again then further action will be taken. Also, please put your comments at the bottom of my talk page, I don't look at the top when expecting new messages. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 07:34, July 30, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::On the [[Diamonds]] page, please stop reverting/undoing my edits. I hope you know doing this 3 times counts as an edit war. If you're wondering I reverted the edits, because you just blanked the section. I might have to protect the page. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 18:12, August 2, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::And stop messing with my talk page header. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 18:26, August 2, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ::::See [http://gta.wikia.com/index.php?title=Diamonds&action=history here]. I'm talking about the large number of blankings, and undoing my edits. And you also removed a ''full'' description, with a lesser description. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 18:31, August 2, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :::::It's not finished yet, It still needs work. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 18:37, August 2, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | The description, still needs a bit more work. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 18:43, August 2, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | :Some of the links are cluttered together. With the links we need to explain the diamonds in as much depth as we can. To unclutter them, try to reword some sentences. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 18:49, August 2, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==Explosion== |
||
| − | Let's see, one it's just a stupid fan-made myth (and just like others doesn't exist). Two I've just played Out of Commission multiple times and never have seen this "explosion". And three if there is a canon ending you would see the explosion in both endings after you kill Dimitri/Jimmy on Happiness Island. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 16:55, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | I do have a clear sense of the endings. I've played the game long enough to no that fans can't come up with a canon ending. And in revenge Pegorino still has the heroin. Departure Time takes place after the ending on Happiness Island. Think about this; why is there an explosion only in the revenge ending? --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:03, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | Pegorino, and Dimitri were working together. They claim the heroin after both were killed. Still I don't care if it's at night THERE IS NO EXPLOSION. And don't flame. This is the last message I'm replying to about these myths. Really alot of unneeded speculation. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:16, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | And don't swear either. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:21, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | == Bunny says == |
||
| − | Same as above no I'm not a wiseguy, I just try to keep this wiki as clean, and '''correct''' as I can. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:25, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | Come on, don't start edit wars. [[User talk:Luiz1910yahoo.com|Talk]] it out with [[User:Luiz1910yahoo.com|Luiz1910yahoo.com]]. [[User:bunnyjoke|Bunny J.]] <small>([[User talk:bunnyjoke|Talk]])</small> 00:43, July 29, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | I am an administrator, and one of the jobs of an administrator is keeping the wiki clean, and correct as stated above. And no I don't feel anymore important that anybody else due to my status. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:32, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | == Note == |
||
| − | Nothing special, I'm an admin because of my hard work and dedication to the wiki. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:36, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | If a bureaucrat - that's me - makes an edit, you probably shouldn't undo it. <b>[[User:McJeff|McJeff]]</b> <sup>[[User_talk:McJeff|(talk this way)]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|(stalk this way)]]</sub> 07:13, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | Staying active, not breaking the rules, contribute good edits know your way around the wiki. Etc. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 17:39, August 3, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | :Yeah, um... we don't do trivia lists here anymore. I just re-removed the trivia list from Tommy Vercetti, and I don't want to see you re-adding it or any other trivia list to any other article. We would've had this conversation weeks ago if I'd noticed you reverting me. Funny thing, I only noticed because I was looking over the other wiki and noticed your username, thought it sounded familiar, saw you'd gotten yourself blocked for edit-warring with that wiki's staff too... then I remembered having you show up on Bully Wiki a long time ago, start a couple edit wars, and it ended up with me having to lock a bunch of pages. |
||
| − | == Edit Warring == |
||
| + | :So, yeah. You got a lot of history against you. Oh, and the trivia? It's [[GTA Wiki:Trivia|our policy]] to delete most trivia. If you don't like that policy you already know where the other wiki is, but if I see you revert me again or readd trivia, you're getting blocked for vandalism. <b>[[User:McJeff|McJeff]]</b> <sup>[[User_talk:McJeff|(talk this way)]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|(stalk this way)]]</sub> 07:38, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | You have a habit of undo people's revisions without providing an explanation. If you think you are correct while everyone else is wrong, please discuss it in the "Discussions" section of the page. You should know when an edit war is happening by now. It is useless and a waste of time undoing each other's revisions over and over again.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 15:36, August 4, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::Provide a reason next time, instead of obnoxiously blocking me, just for pointing out your errors in management. I wasn't aware that trivia was not allowed on here anymore, so you should have explained. That's your fault. Lot of history against me? Don't make me laugh, a few edit wars here and there. A few blocks, big deal. You should start enforcing authority in a respectful manner (and not thinking you are above everyone else, because you're not), otherwise you can be quite easily reported to wikia for violating the TAC by ignoring me and deleting my post from your talk page. I've done nothing wrong here. "not interested in backtalk" is what you said, that's just plain ignorance. Regarding the Bully wiki, i only removed needless information. But then you went ahead and locked the page in the way you wanted it. Again a voilation of TAC. [[User:NT92|NT92]] 13:16, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | Actually you do, and don't remove posts on your talk page. And I said swearing isn't acceptable especially on talk pages. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 15:52, August 4, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::What is going on? [[User:Dan the Man 1983|Dan the Man 1983]] 16:50, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | :See [http://gta.wikia.com/index.php?title=Diamonds&oldid=249042 here]. This was one instance of someone who wrote a full description, then you blanked it for no reason [http://gta.wikia.com/index.php?title=Diamonds&direction=next&oldid=249096 here]. You even wrote unfinished, and it was finished. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 16:23, August 4, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::::I blocked NT92 for edit warring with me. Like I said, he's got a long history of edit warring (which he characterizes as "no big deal" indicating a lack of respect for the administration and the community in general). Also it is common knowledge across all wikis that users can remove talk page comments with the implication being that he can't remove it without having read it. Now he's pulling a Mizu and lawyering over whether I'm allowed to enforce rules against him if he didn't agree that I could enforce said rules against him, and gone running to Community Central when I did it anyway. <b>[[User:McJeff|McJeff]]</b> <sup>[[User_talk:McJeff|(talk this way)]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|(stalk this way)]]</sub> 17:06, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | If you think GTAFAN is wrong, there's no need to correct him over and over again. After three times, you have to stop and explain yourself in detail why you think you are right and he is wrong. You also have to know that not everything you know is right. You have to make sure that your idea can change based on the facts and arguments provided to you. Those who have a stiff mind will have a difficult time living in a changing world.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 16:31, August 4, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::McJeff has blcoked me. I undid his removal of some trivia (unaware that you no longer allow it) but instead of telling me, he just obnoxiousy left the top message above. I don't like the way he thinks he's above other users, just because he's a beauraucrat and when i pointed this out to him he just deleted my post on his talk page, saying he's not interested in backtalk, which is the staple of ignorance, not the behaviour of a beauracrat. I then undid that edit, because i feel he shouldn't undo my post on his talk page just because it's he can't accept, so he blocked me with the arrogant message "See you in a week". [[User:NT92|NT92]] 17:00, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | The main problem with your edits is that you provide little evidence. GTAFAN merely just removed the contents that are completely baseless. I did talk to him and I wish that he don't continue this war with you. Please, it's better to discuss problems with the page in the "Discussions" section. There's no need to play the blame game and mess up the pages. So far all you said is "I told you so". Generally on a wiki, that is not acceptable. Why are you so sure that you're right anyway without showing convincing evidence?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 16:45, August 4, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::::I would characterize ignorance as "someone who, having been blocked repeatedly on multiple wikis for edit warring, chooses to edit war with an administrator on his own talk page". At any rate, since you've already decided to appeal to Wikia Central, there's no reason to continue this drama so I am reblocking with talk page access disabled. <b>[[User:McJeff|McJeff]]</b> <sup>[[User_talk:McJeff|(talk this way)]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|(stalk this way)]]</sub> 17:08, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | Do you really want the ban hammer to be taken out? Stop reverting edits already. You have been warned of that multiple times. Please give me examples that GTAFAN's edits are baseless. So far he refutes the existence of an explosion. You don't need evidence for something that never happened. You are so sure that an explosion happened. Where's the footage?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 16:55, August 4, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::::::NT92, when your block is over, do not edit war in future. If you have a problem with a B'crats or Admins edits, then you take it up with them on their talkpage in a civil manner. You do not revert them and then start an edit war when they revert back. [[User:Dan the Man 1983|Dan the Man 1983]] 17:16, September 12, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| − | ==Ghawar Explosion== |
||
| − | I'll try it again in a minute, I got some work that needs doing on the wiki.--[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 13:12, August 10, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 12 September 2011
LEAVE A MESSAGE
GTW
Don't forget to join us at our new website. A-Dust 00:15, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
Bunny says
Come on, don't start edit wars. Talk it out with Luiz1910yahoo.com. Bunny J. (Talk) 00:43, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
Note
If a bureaucrat - that's me - makes an edit, you probably shouldn't undo it. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 07:13, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, um... we don't do trivia lists here anymore. I just re-removed the trivia list from Tommy Vercetti, and I don't want to see you re-adding it or any other trivia list to any other article. We would've had this conversation weeks ago if I'd noticed you reverting me. Funny thing, I only noticed because I was looking over the other wiki and noticed your username, thought it sounded familiar, saw you'd gotten yourself blocked for edit-warring with that wiki's staff too... then I remembered having you show up on Bully Wiki a long time ago, start a couple edit wars, and it ended up with me having to lock a bunch of pages.
- So, yeah. You got a lot of history against you. Oh, and the trivia? It's our policy to delete most trivia. If you don't like that policy you already know where the other wiki is, but if I see you revert me again or readd trivia, you're getting blocked for vandalism. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 07:38, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Provide a reason next time, instead of obnoxiously blocking me, just for pointing out your errors in management. I wasn't aware that trivia was not allowed on here anymore, so you should have explained. That's your fault. Lot of history against me? Don't make me laugh, a few edit wars here and there. A few blocks, big deal. You should start enforcing authority in a respectful manner (and not thinking you are above everyone else, because you're not), otherwise you can be quite easily reported to wikia for violating the TAC by ignoring me and deleting my post from your talk page. I've done nothing wrong here. "not interested in backtalk" is what you said, that's just plain ignorance. Regarding the Bully wiki, i only removed needless information. But then you went ahead and locked the page in the way you wanted it. Again a voilation of TAC. NT92 13:16, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- What is going on? Dan the Man 1983 16:50, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- I blocked NT92 for edit warring with me. Like I said, he's got a long history of edit warring (which he characterizes as "no big deal" indicating a lack of respect for the administration and the community in general). Also it is common knowledge across all wikis that users can remove talk page comments with the implication being that he can't remove it without having read it. Now he's pulling a Mizu and lawyering over whether I'm allowed to enforce rules against him if he didn't agree that I could enforce said rules against him, and gone running to Community Central when I did it anyway. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 17:06, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- McJeff has blcoked me. I undid his removal of some trivia (unaware that you no longer allow it) but instead of telling me, he just obnoxiousy left the top message above. I don't like the way he thinks he's above other users, just because he's a beauraucrat and when i pointed this out to him he just deleted my post on his talk page, saying he's not interested in backtalk, which is the staple of ignorance, not the behaviour of a beauracrat. I then undid that edit, because i feel he shouldn't undo my post on his talk page just because it's he can't accept, so he blocked me with the arrogant message "See you in a week". NT92 17:00, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- I would characterize ignorance as "someone who, having been blocked repeatedly on multiple wikis for edit warring, chooses to edit war with an administrator on his own talk page". At any rate, since you've already decided to appeal to Wikia Central, there's no reason to continue this drama so I am reblocking with talk page access disabled. McJeff (talk this way)/(stalk this way) 17:08, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
- NT92, when your block is over, do not edit war in future. If you have a problem with a B'crats or Admins edits, then you take it up with them on their talkpage in a civil manner. You do not revert them and then start an edit war when they revert back. Dan the Man 1983 17:16, September 12, 2011 (UTC)