No edit summary |
(→Reply) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
The user has been blocked, thanks for letting me know :). <font size="+1.5" face="Trajan Pro"><b>[[User:The Tom|Tom]]</b></font> [[User talk:The Tom|<sup><u>Talk</u></sup>]] 20:00, December 6, 2011 (UTC) |
The user has been blocked, thanks for letting me know :). <font size="+1.5" face="Trajan Pro"><b>[[User:The Tom|Tom]]</b></font> [[User talk:The Tom|<sup><u>Talk</u></sup>]] 20:00, December 6, 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | ==Undoing edits== |
||
− | |||
Dude not shouting at you or anything but why did you change the things on the AK-47 page I thought that what I posted was very good sure the GTA V images description might have been a bit over but the others were alright I'm just asking in case you think I'M vandalising the page or something cause I would never doo that.[[User:Tentor|Tentor]] 20:25, December 7, 2011 (UTC) |
Dude not shouting at you or anything but why did you change the things on the AK-47 page I thought that what I posted was very good sure the GTA V images description might have been a bit over but the others were alright I'm just asking in case you think I'M vandalising the page or something cause I would never doo that.[[User:Tentor|Tentor]] 20:25, December 7, 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Your grammar and choice of words were rather poor (next time read what you write before you publish and make sure there are no mistakes. Ill admit i have to do better and revising my edits, but the least you can do is read what you right after you publish and go back and fix it). Some of the photos already had relevant captions, and the pictures were more or less were focusing on the AK-47 rather than the protagonist holding them. Your other edits had irrelevant, in accorate, or already stated information. [[User:SgtByrd|SgtByrd]] 21:37, December 7, 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:37, 7 December 2011
Hey SgtByrd, I want to apologize in advance for my flippant comment "Oh god, SO MANY spelling errors!" on my GTA V page edit. I now see the page as it looked before YOU cleaned it up, so I realise you had your work cut out for you. So, I'm sorry... Of course, it will all be removed in a week after the trailer is released :D MyTatuo 19:36, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
GTA V Vehicles
How do you know there will be helicopters in GTA V?
ฬ๏ภ๔єгฬคŦŦlє 23:55, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
They were present in the trailer. >>
-Sgt Byrd
Hi there, just a question about the GTA V vehicles section, can you show me where the blue convertible resembles a VW Eos? I find it much more similar to a Z4, both design-wise and proportion-wise. And it also bears an Ubermacht (the GTA renedition of BMW) badge. Thank you for your time Royesk 13:42, November 8, 2011 (UTC
It the front (FOWARD ON THE HOOD) resembles a vw eos as the grille and headlights have a very simerlar shape, however the rest of the car does not, remember that rockstar tends to base there vehicles off more than one car, and still they will modify it further. Okay yes the back half of the car might resemble a BMW Z4, however dont assume its a vw just because of the badge. The badge is not the same color as the GTA IVs ubermacht, and the reolution, however good, is not good enough to tell if it is or not, plus we dont have any proof that it accually ubermacht, i prefer not to jump to conclusions about stuff like that. Even if it was dubermacht, it still wont necessarilly be a BMW. however we can tell what makes tghevehicles are based off of. Honestly i just dont see the Z4 in it, r for that matter i dont see a bmw in it.-SGT Byrd
Actually, the Ubermacht logo is only blue in artwork, the badges on the cars themselves are red(just for reference: Sentinel Oracle. Oh, and here's a Z4 just for reference: http://www.insightcarsupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bmw-z4%20(3).jpg
The front actually reminds me more of a 1 series http://sritweets.com/autos/wp-content/images/2011-BMW-1-series-convertible/BMW-1-series-convertible-4.JPG Royesk 10:59, November 9, 2011 (UTC)
It just doesnt look like a BMW, as the grille is not split. even if it is Ubermacht doesnt mean it will be a BMW, i suggest u look to cars other than just BMs. I can garentee that it is now a BMW3 sereies, especially since the Sentinel was not a convertible.
Ubermachts never had a split grille, and just because it's an Ubermacht means that it is almost certainly based on a BMW, besides I can't find resemblance to any other car, especially not a Sebring. Also if it was based on an Eos then it would have most certainly been a Vulcar. Royesk
I would appreciate if you stop spamming the Vehicles in GTA V page (or any page in particular) with your own edits, it would be better if you finish off what you desire to put in one edit. I have undone your edits, please change what you need in one publish please, well appreciated. GTANiKoTalk 05:57, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
Please stop being so stubborn, one can tell by the general shape of the logo that it is Dewbauchee. In GTA IV, the only Dewbauchee was the Super GT, an Aston Martin lookalike with Ferrari and Maserati elements. The vehicle in question in the trailer takes design cues from an Aston Martin and a Ferrari. This coupled with the logo makes it painfully obvious that it is branded Dewbauchee.
StickyWickett 23:22, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
Couple things
When you post on talk pages, please remember to sign your name with four tildes ~~~~, and follow GTA Wiki:Image Policy when uploading images. Jeff (talk|stalk) 01:41, November 20, 2011 (UTC)
Reply
The user has been blocked, thanks for letting me know :). Tom Talk 20:00, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
Undoing edits
Dude not shouting at you or anything but why did you change the things on the AK-47 page I thought that what I posted was very good sure the GTA V images description might have been a bit over but the others were alright I'm just asking in case you think I'M vandalising the page or something cause I would never doo that.Tentor 20:25, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
Your grammar and choice of words were rather poor (next time read what you write before you publish and make sure there are no mistakes. Ill admit i have to do better and revising my edits, but the least you can do is read what you right after you publish and go back and fix it). Some of the photos already had relevant captions, and the pictures were more or less were focusing on the AK-47 rather than the protagonist holding them. Your other edits had irrelevant, in accorate, or already stated information. SgtByrd 21:37, December 7, 2011 (UTC)