Hi, welcome to Grand Theft Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the User:GTAFAN 310 page.
Hi. Can you try not to constantly undo someone's edit over and over again? Reverting someone's edit three times in a short period of time is considered edit warring. It's useless and a waste of time to do that. Discuss the situation in the "Discussions" section of the page instead. You could just ask the mods to deal with this situation.--spaceeinstein 15:35, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Stop messing with the Heroin page. I wrote that entire page and you are just making it wrong. Leave It. Also Departure Time and Endings in GTA IV.
there is no proof to say Departure Time and Out of Commission happen at the same time that is wrong this was never confirmed.
I told u, there is the explosion in the revenge ending, and the fact that Timur says Dimitri has died. Why would Luis only go to funland after Pegorino was killed, he goes there immediatley after Dimitri dies, either on happiness island, making it the final thing in the GTA IV era, or on the Platypus making it parrallel to Out of Commission. So stop messing it up.
then departure time would happen after "A Dish Served Cold" not during Out of Commission and like i said there is no proof to say this is bulgarin's jet.
No Luis goes to funland after Dimitri is killed. If he dies on happiness Island, then Bulgarin already has the heroin because Dimitri stole it at the deal. If he dies on the platypus, the Bulgarin gets it off the ship after Niko leaves after killing Dimitri. So in the revenge ending, Departure time would happen, but Niko would at the same time kill Pegorino on happiness island.
what about roman's wedding? which happens a day after a dish served cold? deaprture time would logically have to happen a day before roman's wedding if he got the heroin right after dimitri was killed on the ship and in gta iv endings it can't say more evidence points to revenge thats a little unfair it should say evidence points to both
Please stop undoing his edits. It's counterproductive and a waste of time for everyone. He'll undo yours anyway and the cycle will repeat endlessly. Do you want that to happen? Just leave it be and discuss the problems in the "Discussions" section of the related page.--spaceeinstein 16:50, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
at least be consistant with the story everything that was said was never confirmed i discuss the problem but nothing is getting fixed i have no problem constantly doing this...BE CONSISTANT TO THE STORY and i will stop
- Don't take edits on a wiki personally. A constant war is bad for the site and can get both of you banned. You have to know that there are people out there who can't have their minds changed no matter what you throw at them. Know when to stop and let the people with power deal with it.--spaceeinstein 17:02, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
This is how it goes in "Revenge": Day1: Dimitri killed on ship Day 2:Romans Wedding and Bulgaring and Timur get the heroin off the ship and take it to funland. Day 3: Niko kills Pegorino after finding him and Luis kills Bulgarin and destroys the heroin. See, on the same day.
i dont remember seeing this or mentioned in the game at all why wouldn't "departure time" just take place after a dish served cold did rockstar say out of commission and departure time happen at the same time... NO! did the game reveal the happen at the same time?... NO! and ray bulgarin's jet should be in the myth section why is it mentioned in the heroin section? and why does endings in gta 4 say more evidence ppoints to revenge? I WILL NOT ALLOW THAT THERE what if there are players who choose deal thats not fair to them
Its common sense that that is the way it goes, how else would the heroin be at funland if the player chooses revenge. And the evidence does point more toward revenge, there is no fair about it. It just seems as though Revenge is canon, the evidence supports it more. Bulgarins jet was in the myths but someone took it off. If Departure Time takes place after Niko's story, then why is there an explosion in the sky in the revenge ending, and not the deal ending? because Daparture time is parrallel to out of commision.
It was never confirmed that Departure time is after the GTA IV story, timur says that dimitri is dead, but if it were after the gta iv story, that would mean that the deal ending is canon, and since either are canon, thats why it is parrallel in revenge.
truth is we don't know when departure time takes place in revenge it should say that and evidence doesn't support either ending being canon there really shouldn't be a which ending was canon page and if departure time being the final thing to happen know matter what doesn;t mean deal was canon because really no matter what anybody says there is no correct ending and we don't know if that is bulgarin's jet this was NEVER confirmed
Fine, we will settle on that, it is unknown where Departure Time would fit in the the Revenge ending.
cool glad we have come to an agreement...i don't know about you but my fingers hurt...good fight
This was not a fight, but an argument. Also, could you two please sign your comments at the end with four tidles (~~~~). It makes them easier to read. Anyways, glad things are sorted out now. Also, can you both make sure you don't swear or flame each other in arguments. Thanks. Chimpso (Talk) 05:16, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Editing Misions in GTA IV era
why do u keep editing that, we agreed that it was uncertain when Departure Time happened in the story. I have noted that it is uncertain so why do u keep changing it to show Departure Time the last thing to happen. NT92.
oh sorry about that i will change it hold on
You dont have to keep reverting this, no offence but what u write sounds like a 5 year old wrote it, spelling mistakes, punctuation errors. What is wrote there is what we agreed, so u have no reason to edit it, because all u are doing is writing the same stuff poorly.
you are saying departure time and out of commission happen at the same time i said it is uncertain...and don't judge my spelling when u can't put ing after write
I said it was uncertain too, they are roughly around the same time. i didn't mean to put ing on the end of write then. U cant spell, and u know no punctuation, and stop reverting the Endings in GTA IV page because packie leaving could also be connected to Revenge as well as deal.
i can't spell? u can't even put an ' between the n and t in can't so don't tell me i can't spell and don't put departure time and out of commission side by side if it is uncertain and you keep deleting roman's text messages in endings in gta iv that counts as proof to support deal so i deleted your thing with packie leaving the city being connected to kates death which it was not packie talks about leaving the city even before the ending of gta 4 on friend activity's so kates death being the reason is unlikely. leave my thing with roman's texts and i'll leave the thing with kate's death making packie leave the city. This is a talk page, im not thinking about spelling, u cant spell on the actual pages. Those text messages from Roman is rubbish, how does that support the deal tell me? Kate dying could drive him away so stop bargaining "you leave mine i leave yours", urs is hardly anything to support the deal, wheras i am just saying that Kates death is a good reason for Packie to get out as soon as.
We are just going to get done for edit warring again if we carry on, so just leave it, because the texts dont exactly support deal and i have already put that its uncertain where departure time would be.
why don't we just get rid of the Canon ending of GTA IV page save us both the trouble there is no canon ending so that really shouldn't be there and roman's texts says alot actually but i am going to delete the canon ending to gta 4 page.
Dont just delete it, it is speculation of the evidence, and Romans text say nothing, explain how they are any kind of support for the deal, what i have written is support for the revenge and deal, those calls for example where Niko feels better about himself. U have no right to just delete it.
listen it's best for us both that it just gets removed if we keep it there we will just keep edit warring forever do you want that? endings in gta 4 talks about the outcome of each ending not which was canon the texts do prove deal why doesn't kate send niko anyhting? but anyway it's best that it just gets removed either that or were going to be edit warring forever cause im not backing down anytime soon.
We wont get done if u just leave it, so leave it, its not ur decision to delete it, if one of the administrators says it should be deleted, then fine. The texts prove nothing.
the texts prove the game was pushing the player to do deal no one wants to admit it...but im pretty new so i don't know how to just call an administrator.
The texts are just to show Roman's character as being obsessed with money, and it is trying to get the player to think carefully like should Niko go with the girl who he loves and not go back on his own principles, or go with his cousin, and get the money that could really help them out. It does not push you to the deal, it just tries to get you thinking about the choice, Revenge goes with Niko's morals, But there is loads of Money in the Deal. (U get the same money for Revenge anyway, did u think of that).
it goes with niko's morals? i thought he wanted to stop killing people, listen to the conversation niko and roman have in "That special someone" and understand why deal has alot more of niko's morals aswell and the money niko gets in the revenge ending is a game element not a story element...rockstar did that so the player wouldn't feel cheated but in the story niko gets no money.
It goes with his morals because there is no way Niko would trust Dimitri again, not for all the money in the world, as Kate tells him, he doesn't need it to be happy. He has promised Niko throughout the game that Dimitri will be repayed with a bullet in the head. He kidnapped Roman, but Niko is not like Roman, he wouldn't give up his pride for money, Phil Bell even tells Niko he made the right choice in taking revenge.
but deal explains niko's main reason on why he came to liberty city deal tells the story of that of a guy who tried and failed to find redemption but revenge tells that of a guy who didn't want to be redemed in the first place niko changes in deal he for once turns away from killing someone he hated he wanted to change more than wanted to kill for once follow his cousins wishes and if dimitri tried to pull any sh*t niko would be ready. niko has humanity he's not always hell bent on killing people. And besides niko kills dimitri either way so that oath to kill dimitri was not betrayed. and phil doesn't say niko made the right decision he said he understood why
Anyway, none of that matters that is just your preference. If Niko was so bothered about killing people he wouldn't follow Dimitri to kill him in revenge. Niko is a person who holds grudges, he takes revenge, he trusts only once, and would never trust Dimitri again. I also think that Niko would let Darko live, he held a grudge for 10 years and listened to Roman by letting Darko go. With Dimitri, a rat who would sell everyone out, he would not go back on his promise to kill Dimitri first chance he gets after letting Darko live despite following him for 10 years. And you really better stop deleting that canon ending bit because it is not yours to delete, or your choice, it is an administrators, so just leave it there and if it is not deleted by an admin, then it is no problem, So Stop!
Niko can change he can let go of grudges...niko would let darko live i will agree with but i think the same would apply to dimitri. during the story call roman after completing some missions like "Pest Control" and it might help u understand why niko might just choose deal. And besides it's better to kill Dimitri at the end instead of Pegorino, we actually hear "It's Over" in deal in revenge we hear "I Don't Know" that says quite alot. but whatever even if the canon ending bit stays there we should atleast have this one piece of evidence that points to revenge and one piece of evidence that points to deal.
He would not let Dimitri live after letting go of things with Darko. "It's Over" and "I don't know" doesn't really say much. I do believe that if Rockstar decided for a canon ending which they won't, it would be revenge, no question.
with a heavy heart niko would let it pass...Deal is clearly the ending to get u can tell by comparing the final missions, in deal it's always stormy and rainy in revenge it's just a sunny day the final mission in deal is alot longer and better strunctured. The heli/heli chase in deal lasted for about 10 min. yet the boat/heli chase in revenge lasted for like 10 sec. rockstar would never say the revenge ending is canon.. revenge wraps up the commission arc and the relationship with kate niether played that big of a role in the story. In deal it wraps up the russian mob arc and the relationship with roman a story that we knew of SINCE THE BEGINNING! and i know everyone picked revenge. But i follow one very important saying, what the player wants and what makes a story good are 2 different things.
It is the same length lets jus clear that up, it is stuctured exactly the same, except Niko uses a bike in revenge and a boat in deal. Rockstar would probably go with revenge if they said which was canon. Revenge wraps up the russians cause Niko kills Dimitri! The better story follows revenge, because it it what Niko would do, He wants to be with Kate and promises that killing Dimitri will be the end, no more fighting, only he is forced to do it again when Kate is killed.
yeah he would go for the no more fighting...than he wouldn't kill dimitri on the ship he knows roman alot more than kate she was just some girl i think he would follow roman rather than kate, and remember rockstar MADE both endings so put yourself in their shoes if they were going to decide a canon ending why would it be revenge? why not deal? deal holds much more true to the story. Killing Dimitri at the end, dramatic, climax, and above all else GREAT STORY TELLING! Revenge lacks drama not to much climax and u go after some italian you only met a few seconds ago to avenge the death of some girl you barely knew in the first place...hmmm yes rockstar would deffinitly choose that ending.
It would be revenge because that is what niko would choose. The character we have bben playing would choose revenge after all that, so he could cut his ties with dimitri and live peacfully with kate without having to worry about dimitri. And Kate is a lot more than "just some girl" to Niko. He loves her, she finally accepts him as long as he is able to leave his criminal life. You have no sense of story. The girl always comes before family, if ur family didn't like ur girlfriend would u dump her? I hope not. Revenge is just as epic as Deal, it doesn't lack drama, Niko has just seen the girl he loves die, and to make it worse i was a nobody who killed her. So yes i think Rockstar would choose Revenge. Killing Dimitri earlier shows he is not what he though he was, he is just a pathetic rat who thought he could do everything, and Niko got rid of him. This is not a movie, it is a game that doesn't follow cliches, Pegorino, the nobody who Niko made the mistake of getting involved with.
I have no sense of story? You don't even know that Kate is Niko's friend NOT girlfriend. Bros before Hoes, Niko would follow his cousin rather than Kate. It's more than a video game it's a great story and deserves a good ending. Dimitri was the main antagonist of this game to kill him at the very end below the Statue of Happiness is how this story should end. I like Pegorino and all but he can't live up to Dimitri...and Roman holds more importance than Kate wouldn't you think? So it's better to avenge his death rather than Kate's. Not too many player's cared about Kate which makes it harder to understand why Niko would want to avenge her, and it doesn't give the player much motive to go after Pegorino. With Roman it's different it makes PERFECT sense to the player why he would want to avenge him, and it also gives the player more motive to go after Dimitri simply because how much roman meant to Niko and the player (Who didn't like Roman?) Roman's death adds PERFECT to niko's character development as he has paid for his actions thru the death of his cousin.
Kate agrees to take a chance on Niko at the end, when he promises to give up his criminal life. Are u so stupid u do not realize the game sets up Kate as Niko's love interest. Niko would not follow Roman. All he has done for the whole game is kill and steal for money for him and Roman. Niko wanted to end it all, and he thought that revenge would do, and allow him to live properly with Kate. Revenge shows Dimitri is nothing more than a rat, and also shows Pegorino was a nothing. "A Fat F***ing Joke". Roman is Niko's cousin, of course he holds great importance. I dont mean that Kate is more important, but Niko would never have predicted that Roman would die or kate, as he thought revenge would end it all, which is what he wanted. Roman isn't too upset with Revenge, he marries Mallorie happily, but Kate is appauled in the deal choice. Canonically, Niko and Kate would go out and reveal how much they care about each other, and like i said, this isn't a cliche game. The perfect ending doesn't mean anything, the revenge ending is much better because it isn't a cliche. I cant believe u even said "Bros Before Hoes". Niko as a person isn't like that. Luis Lopez is.
I Meant the Bros before Hoes thing as a joke chill. But Kate doesn't even know what "Not working with Dimitri" means. If she knew he would kill him instead she would want him to do the deal so her opinion is kinda moot. And you said kate is appauled by deal but that proves nothing if roman's texts don't prove anything then that certintly doesn't. Pegorino learns what a rat Dimitri is thru betrayl And Dimitri had everything he needed, THE DEAL but he couldn't let the bellic cousins go he just had to go back and paid for it. Niko learns that money isn't everything and the american dream is a lie. Thats why he said his most famous line to Dimitri "Welcome to America!" and "So this is what the dream feels like" And u only get to know Kate THRU DATES! while u Know Roman thru story.
If kate knew the predicament niko was in: Leave dimitri and live with her, but fear of dimitri retaliating, Kate would know what niko had to do. She wouldn't tell him to do the deal ever, even if she knew the alternative was killing dimitri, because it is trusting someone he said he would never trust again. Dimirti couldn't let the bellics go! wtf dimitri was scared shitless of Niko. The texts dont prove anything, neither do phone calls but Niko feels better about himself after revenge than he does in deal, he tells roman he thinks he made the right choice. Niko believed that revenge would end it, so that is what he would take. He only says welcome to america which is a mint line i gotta say, but its because both of them are foreign, and Nikos just saying that in reference to the corruption of their society. So what u only meet kate through dates. All friends activities and dates with everyone are canon to Niko's time in the city. So that is irrelavant.
Niko doesn't even trust Dimitri when he does the deal but money is more important than holding grudges. Niko makes peace with himself in the deal ending by rufusing to kill someone and changing realizing revenge will not shut the book HE SAYS IT HIMSELF! and kate would want niko to kill Dimitri? PROBABLY NOT! she complains all the time about niko killing people so i think that is unlikely. In Deal Niko says nothing more after Jacob takes him away because there is nothing more to say IT'S OVER thats why. in Revenge niko gives us some statement of values about the decison the plyer has made. Like "Really?..I Don't Know..what did i do?". The game is sorta asking the player "what did u do?" to me it's the choices that are merciful/Non-violent were probably meant to be the correct ones. As roman says "Maybe there is another path to take...A Less violent one" the deal ending shouldn't be called the deal ending it should be called the Anti-Revenge path because thats exacly what it is letting go of revenge and realizing it's not the anwser and a waste of time for everyone. deal shows niko is able to LET GO of past events and move on and for once grow-up.
I never said kate would want to kill dimitri, she just says dont do the deal, but that doesn't mean she would want him to deal if she knew he would go and kill dimitri otherwise. Niko asks what did i do because it just dawned on him that he has ended it, Roman says it's over, and they can finally start making money, the reason Roman asked niko to the city, and Niko agrees. Letting Darko live was Niko letting go of the past. Dimitri is not niko's past, he is just a rat who doesn't deserve to live. U think Niko would forget about Dimitri, if he was so well up on letting go of the past after Roman's death, he would not kill dimitri to avenge Roman, because Roman would'nt want him too. But that is the character Rockstar created, a man who because of his past held grudges. When they made the deal ending, they never meant it for Niko to be letting go of his past, that choice is with Darko. Deal wouldn't offer Niko the closure he wanted, but he thought revenge would. The deal ending is just testing the player, would Niko give up his dignity and pride just for money which he doesn't need to live happily, or get rid of a rat that would continue to make his life a misery unless dealt with. Niko would let darko live, and take revenge on dimitri.
Actually revenge tests the player will you let revenge take u over? or learn to let go of the past? dimitri is also part of niko's past and present but still the past thru the whole game most of niko's ally's tell him that there's no time for revenge and it won't help thru THE WHOLE GAME THIS WAS BROUGHT UP the choice was to test the player have u paid attention to the story and choose to put dimitri behind u by doing one last thing? or ignore that and choose the violent path, and notice america had no effect on u (it couln't change u) it couldn't rid ur desire for revenge all the time...it was a test that explains roman's texts.
Deal isn't letting go of the past, it is the greed for money, the saying money changes people. Niko isnt the one to be lured in by the thrill of money. He will do anything for money but when it comes to personal issues, he wouldn't go back on his principles. Niko would not let go of Dimitri, he would take his well deserved revenge, instead of being greedy and going for money, Deal shows that because u were greedy, Roman dies, and revenge shows that because u hold grudges, Kate dies. Dimitri someone who betrayed him, kidnapped roman and sold him out to bulgarin. Same as luis kills bulgarin for revenge, niko kills dimitri for revenge, and Niko is a lot colder than Luis is. I know the story inside out, which is why i know that revenge is the canon ending, with or without Rockstars confirmation. I wont go putting this on the proper page, but i know that if Rockstar announced the canon ending, they would confirm that it is revenge.
The Deal ending is canon c'mon U KNOW IT Revenge is a greed for killing Deal i mean the anti-revenge path is choosing to not kill dimitri it doesn't take much to know deal is correct. Why do u seem so sure that they will confirm it as revenge? what if they confirm it as deal? the anti-revenge path was the true ending to GTA IV. Believe it or not my first choice was revenge...but i didn't understand the story at that time i was new at it but paying close attention to the story the anti-revenge path was the ending...rockstar pretty much already confirmed this by making the deal ending much more dramatic climatic/cinematic...and full of emotion it's darker and more sinister dimitri dies in the most satisfying why (bleeds to death on happiness island) think about why did rockstar make the deal ending much more emotional and deep? whats with romans texts? why is it always rainy and stormy? why is it longer? i know this isn't evidence but why would they spend more time making the anit-revenge path if it was not canon?
Yeah whatever ur wrong its revenge. Revenge is in no way greed, Niko was ridding himself of a rat so he could live peacefully with Kate, that is all he wanted. The deal is pure greed, Why doesn't kate appear after deal, she said she would be there for him and u dont hear from her again, she may as well be dead. and both endings have the same length of missions, same level of epicness but Revenge is what Niko would do, that says all that Revenge ending is canon. but anyway i am in england and it's late, will can carry on debating 2morrow.
Revenge is VERY GREEDY he refused to help out roman and think about himself and his issues with Dimitri not looking after roman or mallorie revenge is the selfish path...deal is quite obviously canon. So killing someone on a ship and choosing to think about ur self instead of helping ur cousin is in no way greed? revenge is ALWAYS greedy no matter what anyone says. Both money and revenge are greedy...but letting revenge take u over is MUCH worse than letting money take u over. Niko wants to CHANGE he's not always wanting to kill people Dimitri was not worth his time. DEAL WAS CANON!!!
Deal is the only greedy path because of the money. If Niko lets Darko live, which is also something we both agree he would do, that is Niko letting go of his past, and taking Roman's advice. Taking revenge doesn't mean Niko isn't looking after Roman, if anything he is protecting him by getting rid of Dimitri once and for all. Niko and Roman had enough money to live happily and in Revenge Roman knows that. He is not thinking of just himself, Niko is thinking: "I will kill this rat and end this for myself, then be with Kate and Roman and I can finally live in peace and make money ourselves." They are Niko's intentions. And yes Niko wants to change, he is willing to give it all up for Kate, who he would rather be with compared to bagging a load of money for Roman, because they can be happy without it. He cares for both of them equally, but because Roman is his cousin, who will always be at his side no matter what, he wanted to prove to Kate he could change and put his criminal life behind him, but before he could do that, Dimitri needed to be out of the picture, because as long as Dimitri was still on his case, there would be no escape. Doing a heroin deal is not putting his criminal life in the past, it is going back on his own principles, and throwing everything away for money he doesn't need or particularly want, it's drug money. U gotta remember that Niko thought that by killing Dimitri on the ship that would be the end, no more killing, Revenge wasn't taking him over, because the whole point of Revenge is that it is the final straw, the last step he must take to live normally, with his cousin making legit money, and with Kate. He says to Roman It ended where it began, and says to Kate it's over, and he feels better in himself.
he would deffinitly let darko go yes but he would also let dimitri go because he was not worth his trouble, niko lets go of quite alot in deal HE CHANGES america has changed his thought about revenge all the time like dimitri i think said "america has calmed u down" it's more than doing a heroin deal it's about not letting revenge control u anymore. But i think he cared more about roman because his reaction to his death was alot more intense than his reaction to kates. revenge can't really be the final straw it certintly wasn't in this case kate got killed he had to kill pegorino, that doesn't seem like the final straw why else do u think niko says "I Don't Know" niko doesn't make money in the revenge path, in the revenge ending pegorino shouts stuff like "How are you going to get by in this country if u ain't gonna go after the big money" Dimitri is put out the picture anyway he is killed and beaten no matter what. And niko doesn't really feel better about himself look at the look on his face after he shoots pegorino in the final cutscene he doesn't look anybetter the look on his face says it all. Since the beginning of the game it's been money. money, money Niko and Roman need to survive and kate doesn't really understand the situation niko and roman become rich but niko pays for his criminal life thru the death of his only family in liberty now all he has to do is one more thing...end things with rascalov and avenge your cousin.
Look, just read again what i put before properly and u will understand why Niko would choose revenge. Dimitri was well worth the trouble because he needed to get rid of him if he had Roman were to live peacefully, Roman with Mallorie, Niko with Kate. It is not letting revenge control him because it was Niko's last job so he could be with Kate, Niko THOUGHT it was the final straw. Niko does feel better, he and Roman know money isn't a priority as they are very capable to live normally and legitamately. Dimitri is killed either way, but storywise, Niko would get rid of him on the boat so as to prevent further incidents. When Niko discovers where Dimitri is, he realizes that he could just finish it, he wouldn't do a deal with a traitor when he could just finish it, and be with Kate, that is what Niko thinks will happen. Niko isn't obsessed with money, get this into ur head, he would end things with rascalov first chance he got, Roman wouldn't think of him any differently, he realizes Niko did what he had to do, and finally, say its over so they can start making money themselves. No matter what u say, I can just justify revenge better than u can justify deal.
Pay attention to the story CALL ROMAN after completing some missions and it may help u understand why deal was what he would have gone for and you can justify revenge better? HAHAH i think it's the other way around bro. If he can let darko live he could let Dimitri. And Niko wasn't obsessed with money? Sure that's why he goes around killing people for A holes...he doesn't care about money at all does he? NIKO ONLY SAYS "IT'S OVER' in deal. He says instead in revenge "I DON'T KNOW"! how can anyone miss what rockstar was saying here? Niko doesn't want to kill people it's good that he would decide to put dimitri's betrayls behind him and move on by getting money to help his cousin he hated dimitri BUT he loved roman enough to do the deal. I can back up the anti-revenge path alot more than you can back up the violent one. REVENGE DID NOTHING for niko he just got deeper in his criminal life NOT OUT OF IT! in the anti-revenge path he leaves his criminal life in the revenge path he embraces it...how is killing dimitri on that ship leaving his criminal life behind? Surely he knew the pegorino's wouldn't be happy about this he even says to kate on the way to the wedding that he wants to leave his criminal life behind, he never said he already has.
You two can argue and speculate as much as you want. There is no confirmed canon ending. Until Rockstar confirms it, no matter haw many "clues" you have, we cannot say either one is canon. So stop wasting time with this argument. Chimpso (Talk) 06:49, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
I Agree there can't be a correct ending since if there was why are there 2? but i was just doing that because HE said that there was a canon ending...so i'm like "Two can play at that game" so yeah.
I do pay attention to the story, calling Roman after missions just has Niko telling him what he's been up to. U are basically saying Rockstar intended for Deal to be canon, because its apparently longer and better told. ITS THE SAME LENGTH, THE STORY IS JUST AS GOOD EITHER WAY. Both endings are good, but Niko would've took revenge, that is what im saying. Your reasons for supporting deal or pretty weak compared to mine for revenge. Everything i say for revenge fits Niko and the story we have played so far, including the dialogues between the characters, all friend activities and girlfriend dates, which are canon to Niko's time in the city. How many times do i have to say this, he didn't need the money to live the life he wanted. Niko wanted Kate, he didn't want money, it isn't like Roman would hate Niko forever because of the deal, he doesn't mind, he is happy Niko ended it after killing Dimitri in revenge, and is why he says that its over and they can start making money. Killing Dimitri on the ship is exactly Niko leaving his criminal life behind, because for Niko, he believed that after doing that, he would be able to live in peace with Kate, who he wanted to be with, and knew Kate would not respect him for doing the deal. Deal is the definition of being a criminal: Agreeing to sell heroin for dirty money for a mafia family, and providing the russians with heroin. Niko wanted out, and thought revenge would be the final fight. Niko never anticipated an attack from Pegorino, he thought they were ruined, Phil Bell calls him before the wedding to say the family are truly ruined, and Phil leaves them. This is why revenge is the more realistic choice and what Niko would make. If it was a film, Deal would be the alternate ending that the test audiences didn't like. And Revenge would be the true ending.
Have u heard nothing at the bottom? You are only wasting your time...First thing first how is deal being a criminal? and revenge not? if he didn't need the money than WHY DOES HE KILL PEOPLE FOR THESE GUYS. How is revenge realistic? you just said and i quote "ITS THE SAME LENGTH, THE STORY IS JUST AS GOOD EITHER WAY" so how can one ending be more realistic than the other? niko wanted out yes but killing dimitri on that ship isn't what i would call "getting out" just getting deeper in. I Hope you realize that the dudes at the bottum are right, HOW CAN THERE BE A CANON ENDING IF THERE ARE 2 ENDINGS! think on that one. If R* would go and make 2 endings and they new only 1 of them would be canon than what's the point of the other ending? To test the audience? PLEEZE! what a waste that would be. I Have already addressed my point on why deal was better than revenge from a storytelling point of view...but u don't seem to understand. Atleast i understand that there is no canon ending. Bro u need to grow up.
Unrealistic (Deal) does not mean it's bad. But GTA IV is realistic and revenge is just the more realistic choice, and it is what Niko would choose. Both are canon, it's the player's choice, but revenge follows the story better. Revenge is not getting deeper in because it was supposed to be the last time he held a gun. He was going to forget the life after that. Bro?? u have been ranting on the same as me so u also need to grow up. U were saying that deal was canon before, i said revenge is canon becuase that is the game i play and to me it is. He would not do the deal for all the reasons i have said. He would'nt do the deal, and your reasons for deal are very weak. I just much prefer the more realistic ending to a realistic game, with a realistic character. Either way, your weak deal reasons are not going to convince me otherwise, and my obviously superior revenge support reasons will not convince u either. I will just say now, if u want to be the big man, just don't reply to this and it will be over.
My weak deal reasons? sure if it's so weak why do u respond? i think u are just bothered cause my reasons are stronger than yours. when i said u need to grow up i meant u don't realize niether is canon did u read what i said at the bottum? I think i am the bigger man because i understand there is no canon ending. the endings are exacly the same eitheer roman or kate dies niko gets 250,000 $ anyway and dimitri and the peg die...THAT'S IT! but again logically niko would go for Deal if anything He says he does not want to deal with death anymore...killing dimitri on that ship? seems like dealing with death to me. How can one ending be more "realistic" than the other? if they are almost the same? acuse me for not wanting the violent road and perfering not to kill people. But revenge isn't getting out how is it? are u saying revenge is the anwser for everyone than? THAT'S SICK! Reasons why deal is better:
1. It sums up the entire story of GTA IV while revenge sums up just the commission story.
2. You go after Dimitri...he's the final boss and killled at the end. Better than killing some italian at the end.
3. Kate is not as easy to care about than roman so her death and final mission is pointless.
Go on Deconstructoid/GTA IV endings.com they can explain better than i ever could why deal was superior. CHECK IT OUT!
They are very weak reasons u give. I just respond to show u how better my reasons for revenge are. Don't get annoyed about it. Revenge is more realisic because it would be Niko's choice logically. Revenge wraps up Niko's intentions for getting out of crime, because he thought he would be free after killing Dimitri. I fully understand that both are canon it is up to the player, but if there was a canon ending it would be revenge, obviously. Just because u as a player doesn't care about Kate, I dont either, but storywise, including her dates which are canon, Niko does, they both want to be with each other. Btw, that destructoid rubbish, is, well a load of rubbish. In fact, i wouldn't be surprised if u wrote it. Actually, reading further, i noticed that u have just been copying this crap the whole time, so they are not only really weak reasons, they're not even yours! HAHA LOL U ARE AN EPIC FAIL.
LOL U ONLY THINK IT'S RUBBISH cause THE TRUTH HURTS if it said revenge was better U WOULD NEVER SAY IT WAS RUBBISH! THEY ARE IN FACT MY REASONS! Like i said I agree with that artical how is that a fail? U fail even more so cause u don't even know what a FAIL IS! Revenge wraps up Niko's intesions to get out of his criminal life? I Don't see it but DEAL WRAPS UP HIS ENTIRE STORY! How is that a weak reason? U only say they are weak cause it's not what u think u only say that artical was rubbish CAUSE IT'S NOT WHAT U WANNA HERE! Don't say i fail until u know what it even means! That is the true Fail! My opinion is shared with that artical I 100% Agree with it. U don't even know what fail is OWNED!
I've got an idea, why don't u go and think of something to say that u thought of yourself, LOL!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH! U FAIL!! U FAIL!!! Oh, by the way, Niko would not do a deal with someone who betrayed him. U FAIL!! U FAIL!!
LOL! are u kidding is that the BEST u can do? first off i share the same opinion as that artical I in fact thought of that stuff perfectly for myself. U don't understand the story alot pay very very close attention to Niko and Roman's Conversation in that special someone and atleast try to understand. U say i fail and laugh like a little Child..I fail? sure yet at the same time u can't even act your own age (If your not 5) in these Debates TRY to be mature. LOL YOU ARE THE FAILFAILFAILFAILFAILFAIL not me oh BTW Niko cares more for roman and helping him out than killing Dimitri U FAIL!
I know the story better than u. How can u go on about writing fail and laughing u are doing it too u complete and utter moron. So again...U FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Did u find this on Destructoid as well? Niko would take revenge just face it. Bro.
Yes im the complete and utter moron yet U can't even get the timeline right... i know the story better than u ever will. You even said I failed not too long after i said it first on the other dabate..U STOLE THAT FROM ME! YOU are the one to face the facts Deal was better COMPARE THE MISSIONS too each other and answer these questions if deal is not canon.
1. Why is it dark, stormy and rainy in deal BUT NOT revenge? hmmm
2. Why is niko more affected by Roman's death than Kate's? hmmm
3. Why is the final cutscene in deal much much more darker and sinsister than the one in revenge? hmmm
4. why does roman send niko those texts? hmmm
5. Why is it that in revenge niko has an unsatisfying look on his face? (check it out for yourself)
6. Why is it that in deal Niko Jacob tells niko "IT'S OVER"and niko says nothing afterwords, yet in revenge when roman says we won Niko responds with "I DON'T KNOW"!
7. Why is the final mission in deal more climax (cause u can tell it is) That heli/heli crash on the island was WAY more better than the Heli/boat crash
8. Niko chases Dimitri all over happiness island while he only needed to chase pegorino for 5 min.
9. Why does since the beginning of the game everyone tells niko that revenge is not what he is after. (listen to roman and niko's conversation in that special someone)
10 WHY DID R* PUT MORE TIME IN DEAL IF REVENGE WAS CANON? HMMMMMMM
I said FAIL! as i was just messing because u kept saying it. There is not more effort or time into deal than revenge, that is all in your head. They are equal on that front. Just that revenge is a more realistic outcome. Why do u keep saying "hmmmmmm HMMMMM" u make me think of u as a queer who wont get out of your face.
1: The weather doesn't mean s***, it wasn't raining when i played it so don't make crap up. 2: Niko is affected by the deaths equally. 3: The final cutscene is not any more sinister or dark, just Dimitri is there instead of Peg, and a bit of different dialogue. 4: Stop going on about the texts, it is just the way Roman is. Instead, ask yourself why Niko tells Roman he feels he made the right choice in revenge. 5: In revenge Niko has an unsatisfying look? Oh yeah i forgot he was really happy and throwing a party in deal after Roman died. 6: He says "I dont know" because he though it would have finished on the boat, yet he ends up having to kill Pegorino. 7: The climax is good equally. And in revenge Niko makes a jump from a bike, which looks 10x better anyway. The boat/heli crash is not a reason for more time into deal, do u really think they would favour one ending over another? 8: I killed Dimitri on hapiness island in 30 secs just headshoot him his armour is gone in no time. 9: Everyone does say no revenge, and he gives it up by letting Darko go which he would have done, but he needed Dimitri gone if he wanted to be with Kate. Listen to Niko and Kate's conversations. 10: They didn't.
You didn't answer my questions the right way btw hmmmmm stands for waiting for an answer everyone knows that. They obviously put more time in deal IT WAS WAYYYY LONGER weather stands for drama and it was raining in deal not in revenge. I don't know why yours was the only one that didn't cause the only way to get rid of the rain in deal is weather cheats. Go play the endings again or u will never get it.
I played the endings, but both endings were treated fairly. I honestly can't remember the weather i will play it again. It wasn't longer, the car chase is the same, then the shootout at the casino, same and then a boat chase instead of bike chase. The chase to happiness island is no longer stop making that up. But it doesn't matter because revenge is the more logical option that Niko would take. End of.
Deal is the more "moral" ending it's crystal clear the chase is in fact longer in deal that doesn't mean it was not being fair it was just more developed. The weather is there...are u even playing it? I Don't know but it's rainy as hell in deal i will tell u that.
Rockstar did not intentionally make deal better. They are both developed equally. Deal is not moral because Niko's morals would not tell him to work with a previous traitor. Not even for Roman, Not for all the money in the world. He doesn't want it, he hates it and wants out, he and Roman know they can live just as well without it. He just wanted to kill Dimitri and get it all over with. He would do that for nobody else, BUT FOR HIMSELF, so he could be free and forget about everything after that, because with Kate he realised he could live normally. Kate told him he can still be a good person and in Deal it is not changing him, it is showing he is willing to give up his self respect for drug money, and work with a crook mafia family instead of kill Dimitri and finish it. Deal is not something Niko would fall for, especially with Dimitri.
He wouldn't do it for roman? HE DOES ALL THE WORK HE DOES TO HELP ROMAN! Revenge is the selfish path cause niko and rom needed $ and niko choosing to kill dimitri was just about him and didn't care about helping his cousin you said that yourself. Roman shows niko revenge is waste of his time and isn't going to make him feel anybetter about himself Niko knew Killing Dimitri wasn't going to change much he is in his criminal life anyway either way HE NEVER GETS OUT but atleast in deal he tried to get out by doing one last thing. Niko did want to kill Dimitri BUT remember what U. L. Paper told Niko about that "None of us want to kill them when we find them" Niko always goes on about "He needs to do what he can to survive" EVERYONE pretty much tells him that revenge isn't what he's after. Roman even says "Now that you know that revenge is not what you are after u can look for fullfilment in other places...healthy ones." Like i said Anti-Revenge represents Niko wanting redemption but failed to find it. Check the E-Mails U.L.Paper sends niko after killing or sparing darko, It may help understand.
BUT HE DOES FEEL BETTER ABOUT HIMSELF! He kills Dimitri and feels better because he thinks it's over. Roman and Niko don't need money. They have enough for the life they want. In Deal he is going into the shit again by chancing it when he could just END IT with revenge. Revenge usually does change nothing, but in this case, Dimitri would be constantly sending hitmen to kill him. Niko is completely against the deal, but his face lights up when Roman tells him Dimitri is on the Platypus, Niko says he could just go and kill him and end it there and then since now he knows where he is. He goes on about survival? Killing Dimitri ASAP is essential to his survival! UL Paper was refering to Florian or Darko when he said that none of us want to kill them. We already know that Niko would follow Roman with Darko. But he would follow himself with Dimitri, not Roman again. Dimitri was personal. Niko may want redemption, but what he wants more is to live in peace and with Kate he could do just that. Kate was everything Niko needed to help him move on and the last thing he would is knowingly lose her respect.
Niko feels no better about himself in revenge once again why does he say "I Don't Know" and lol it's over is only said in deal BUT NOT REVENGE! UL PAPER was referring to Dimitri as well when u think about. AND HE IS NOT WITH KATE how many time do i have to mention this Redemption is what niko wanted all along that was his main motive to coming to liberty to star fresh and leaving the past behind NOT TRYNG TO JUST FINISH IT AND JUST MAKE THINGS WORSE. The consequences niko is faced with in deal PROVE to be more moral. Roman i'm sure meant more to niko than kate, i'm sure with all the stuff he's been thru he could care less about loosing some girl's respect. He would ALWAYS follow his cousin his ONLY FAMILY IN LIBERTY! family always comes first, Niko is a family man u can tell. He would put roman above kate ANYDAY he really liked kate and all but roman should always come first.
U should listen to the phonecall after killing Dimitri on the boat, Niko says he feels better that its over, "it ended where it began". He is happy Kate is at the wedding, and is smiling and couldn't be happier because he is with Kate and everything is fine...until Pegorino gets there. He went to Liberty to live the dream with his cousin, but found it was a lie, not for redemption, and even if he did, in deal he isn't trying for it because he would be taking dirty drug money he doesn't want and losing his self respect. His intention of starting fresh was dead the second Niko got off the boat in Liberty. He met Kate and she said he was good enough to turn it around. She would be with him if he left the life. Killing Dimitri was Niko's attempt to get out, and be with Kate, she isn't "some girl", she is just as important to him as Roman, he loves both of them in different ways. He wouldn't ALWAYS follow his cousin, no way would he. Roman has been nothing but a burden to him and all Niko has done is help him out. Niko isn't a family man, he protects his family but isn't a family man. He would never put Roman above Kate they are of EQUAL importance. They would both come first. Kate probably before Roman if it had to be one before the other. Men put their women first. U are dumb if u think Niko is so heartless that he would ditch Kate to follow his cousins greed for money.
put there women first yes BUT KATE WASN'T NIKO'S WOMEN! since she was just a friend and roman was family HE CAME FIRST! Why would niko pick kate over Roman? that makes no sence at all. He doesn't ditch kate he doesn't follow her advise she doesn't even know the situation why would he? He would follow roman to help him with his marriage not throw it away for a grudge. And quit saying "Be with kate" she's not niko's women in many ways roman is way more important than her he's been there since scrath she pops up in the middle and u barely see her again...the only other time u really do socialize with her is thru dates. Protecting family is always being a family man. Greed for revenge and killing and wicked works are worse than Money, everyone should no that.
Oh wow, Seriously? The first thing I do is go to "My home" and I see this Bullcrap? Just seriously, you guys should just shut up about that crap. It's a game. No need to spam all of this. IanMontes 23:25, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Niko would get money to help Roman's marrige? that is just riduculous, if u paid any attention to the game u have been playing u would know that both Niko and Kate want more than friendship. Her dates are canon so that is irrelevant, Roman is only in the story for about 20 missions, he has no involvement in Niko's choices or throughout the game. Kate knows that Niko has a choice to go back on his principles, that is all she needs to know, and Niko wants to be with Kate for good, they understand each other because of their lives of growing up around violence. He wants her more than betraying himself to rake in money he doesn't want or need. Deal is an option that goes against Niko as a character, which is why it is unrealistic. There is no such thing as greed for revenge, he was turning down money to kill a rat. That isn't greedy. To IanMontes, ive got an idea, why don't u just butt out of things that dont concern u. If we want to argue our reasons we will. Its a talk page, it is what they are for.
why would rockstar give u an option that goes against niko as a character?..I know nothing? Kate is not niko's girlfriend i've been on dates with her she says it herself. He betrays roman in deal and in a way himself He rufused to help his cousin with the marrige u obviously are the one that doesn't pay attention read roman's texts. whuch you think are so rubbish..and those phone calls aren't? You can't seem to undertsand that kate isn't niko's chick. Roman is more important ask anyone. He's able to atleast try to put his past behind him but failed to so revenge he just tries to embrace it. He would want to help roman and mallorie. There is a very good reason why Roman's opinion is more importrant than kate's, He knows what niko will do if he doessn't work with dimitri...all kate knows is that he won't work with dimitri, she doesn't undertsand that he would kill him instead. Her opinion is kinda limited. Deal is not an option that goes against niko if anything it may sit right there with him for instance this little line he says "I Don't know how long i can keep dealing in death" What does that sound like to you to me it sounds like a guy who is sick of killing like this line "Why Do I Have to Keep Killing?"
Deal goes against Niko's morals. Why would he get deeper in acriminal life with a heroin deal, with someone who betrayed, when he would just get out. Kate and Niko want to be together, and Dimitri is the obstacle standing between Niko and a chance to move on, with Kate. Finding Kate made Niko realize he was able to live normally. Kate knows enough to say that Niko would be shallow to work with a traitor. Roman is an idiot. Niko loves him just like Kate but he is an idiot. He gambles away everything he touches. The shit Niko has had to do for him since he got to Liberty. Him not wanting to deal with death is the perfect reason to kill Dimitri on the ship and get out of the life for good. He would never have to kill again after Dimitri, that is what Niko thought. Niko is not interested in dirty money he doesn't want or need, to send Roman on a frickin honeymoon! He wouldn't read that pointless text and say to himself "Oh yes, i could do a deal with a rat who betrayed me and break a promise to myself, send Roman to paradise, I will have learned absolutely nothing and Kate will never speak to me again, I will also lose all my dignity and self respect....But what the hell!"
Deal can't go against Niko's morals if it did than why did rockstar give us that choice? If they knew that he wouldn't do it than i it probably wouldn't be a choice. And why would niko get deeper in his crime life by killing Dimitri? Kate did in fact speak to niko again (phone calls when the game is finished) How the hell could you know he didn't read that text? If it's pointless why did rockstar put it there? He didn't even love kate THEY WERE NOT TOGETHER! He loved roman though family comes before friends. Helping roman was more important to him than killing dimitri. Niko also promised that he and roman would "Make it to the top" in revenge niko broke that promise to roman didn't he? By throwing it away for a grudge. Niko does not want to kill deal shows he finally put his finger off the trigger and decided survival was more important than a grudge and i think he would realize this grudges are stupid. Why don't i just take some advise from a girl i barley know who doesn't even know the situation in the first place. Yes he would take her advise for sure. Niko learns nothing in the revenge path look at his face in the final cutscene, when he slowly lowers the ak-47 down when he shoots pegorino he looks disapointed to me. In deal Niko learns money isn't the most important thing in the world and that revenge just leads u to greater suffering. He would choose deal cause He came to liberty TO NOT LET REVENGE EAT HIM UP AGAIN! that was his main reason for coming to liberty in revenge that main reason is thrown out the f*cking window. He says this in the deal path when chasing pegorino's goons. He choose deal to not let revenge take him again.
U keep saying revenge is something niko wouldn't do then why would they give us that choice as well? It is to give the player a dilemma. U IDIOT. Niko WOULD read the text, dont' u know English. But after reading it he would't say that to himself would he? It is a pointless text, why did Rockstar include the pointless girfriends and their pointless texts, they all serve a purpose to flesh out the charcters! Niko did love Kate, they got together at the wedding, but she was killed. Course he loved Roman, and Kate, and it isn't a choice of who comes first because neither was in danger, it was just a choice of money or principle, and principle is more important than money. Principle means everything to Niko. Roman was pefectly fine without the money as was Niko. He doesn't need the money! He wants a basic life he says so himself. If he could live with Kate that only makes it better for him. He did not barely know Kate, he knew her well enough to know he could love her, that why she is his Love Interest! He looks upset in both endings, he is nearly crying in Deal, Jacob pulls him away while Niko mutters to himself how Roman did not hurt anyone. In Revenge, he accepts when Roman says they can start making money, he is upset but knows it was not his fault that Kate died. He regrets the deal in that ending cause roman is dead and knows he should have just killed Dimitri when he had the chance. In deal, all he learns is that Dimitri again betrayed him, Niko would NEVER work with Dimitri. And revenge never has took him, he seeks it with Darko, but lets it go. He came to Liberty to GET REVENGE on Florian. Who told u he came to escape it if his reason for going to Liberty was to get it! That is his entire backstory, his army unit was betrayed, he wanted revenge. But u probably didnt know that because u clearly pay no attention to the story
Could u misundertsand anymore? that's exacly what im saying why did they give the choice u clearly don't know "sarcasm". He came to liberty to LET GO OF REVENGE. And i'm the idiot u just said niko would never work with dimitri than why did rockstar give us that choice U JUST SAID THIS TO ME ABOVE! U IDIOT! How can u know anything about the story when u DON'T EVEN UNDERTSAND NIKO AND KATE NEVER WERE TOGETHER! I know he wanted revenge he THOUGHT he wanted revenge but what he was truly looking for was to let it go. He's upset cause not just at kate but at the face that he could not change, He couldn't let go of his revenge desire which he THOUGHT he had. Niko says very clearly in the revenge ending in a phone call to roman after it is finished that he should have done the deal HE SAYS IT HIMSELF! You don't seem to get and face that dimitri learns more about himself in deal. HE MAKES PEACE WITH HIMSELF! He regrets his decision either way, But in revenge he actually says he should have done the deal. The texts can;t be pointless there worth the mention why do these texts favour deal and not revenge? If he didn't need the money why does he do these jobs for everyone? He clearly does need the money. Even on friend activity's with roman (Which you say ARE canon) He says "You have to move on from the things that happend to you and look at the chances to make lots of money in this country".
U are the one who doesn't understand. For a start, Niko had never taken revenge before coming to Liberty City. He came to Liberty to take revenge not let go of it. He waned revenge on Florian or Darko, thats why he came. Niko and Kate wanted to be together, and they are in revenge for a few minutes. He already let it go with Darko. After killing Dimirti on the ship, Niko is happy, not sad. He is glad he got rid of Dimitri cause it means he can live peacefully with Kate. Niko never says he should have done the deal, Roman says that, but in Deal Niko is nearly crying because he regrets that he didnt just kill Dimitri. Kate is not the type to send texts that pressure Niko, she knows he has a brain of his own, and if he wants to be with her, he will use it and get rid of Dimitri. In the friend activities, which are canon, u shouldn't even question that, it is Roman who goes on about his fascination with money, Niko tells him he just wants to get by, with a life that isn't terrible, but normal. He did those jobs for money, obviously, Niko says, he doesn't care if he lives or dies, he can do it, and he is good at it. Those jobs are nothing personal for him. Niko and Roman have what they need for a good life, and Dimitri needs to go. Logically, Niko would go for revenge, because he thought that was the way out, whereas deal is something a strong character like Niko wouldn't go for. That is why in deal Niko regrets the decision, because it is the shallow choice that he would avoid.
PLEEZE undertsand KATE AND NIKO ARE NOT TOGETHER u can't seem to get that in your head. And i already told u if he would go for one decision THAN WHY DID ROCKSTAR PUT THE OTHER THERE! Dimitri goes either way he dies no matter what You clearly will not get it, Niko actually does say he should have done the deal (Phone calls after final mission is over "revenge") You say Kate wouldn't pressure niko with the texts? are u seriously going to use that defense that's not even a defense. The terrible life is killing which niko wants to avoid YOU INTEND TO KILL SOMEONE IN REVENGE but in deal killing is not what niko intended. Niko didn't kill dimitri to get him off he and romans backs, He did it out of revenge thats why it's called revenge not getting dimitri off our backs. He didn't kill dimitri on the ship for a way out he didn't for revenge thats why it's called that.
I think u should understand that they REALLY WANT to be together. And Niko knows that if he takes revenge they will be. Rockstar gave a lot a decisions that are out of Niko's character like killing or sparing Cherise. Niko wouldn't kill her. In deal, Niko intends to accept a deal, and lose his chance to be with Kate. Kate would leave it with what she said on the phone, Niko is smart enough to know that the right choice is revenge, so he could get out and live with Kate normally.
If rockstar had choices that were out of character than rockstar doesn't even know there own character it's THE PLAYERS choice to decide Niko's nature thru these choices. And Kate and Niko were just friends not together at all they were about to in revenge BUT NEVER DID. The right choice is NEVER the violent option. As a christian i like the non-violent path better..God taught us revenge was never the answer right? With that said if a decision is merciful or non-violent it's the right way.
Don't bring religion into this. Niko and Kate really wanted to be together. And i seriously doubt Niko is a christian, and he takes revenge. If u are against violence why the hell do u play GTA. U should play Toy Story or something. With choices like greed for money and loss of self respect, compared to killing and possibly being able to live normally, I would take revenge if i was face with that choice. Revenge solves problems in the right circumstances for example, in Darko's case, it doesn't help, But in Dimitri's case, it damn well helps. In deal, he avenges Roman, are u saying he should have let that go. U love the deal ending but both endings are about vengence. Every GTA game has an antagonist that the player takes revenge on. Action movies all feature the heroes taking revenge. Niko is no different, Revenge is good, because Dimitri deserves to die.
First off religion is in everything LOL! The video game isn't all about killing and stealing which i don't like but i like the story and gameplay not the violence. Niko kills Dimitri NO MATTER WHAT that defense won't get u anywere. Niko actually is different that's why we have these choices R* even said NIKO HAS HUMANITY! Both endings are about vengence yes BUT in deal Niko TRIED to let go of vengence but failed to do so. How can Dimitri help? But darko didn't? Niko wanted darko dead more than dimitri. And we both said he would let darko go. THE HERO TAKES REVENGE EITHER WAY! No one can loose on that. No he shouldn't let Roman's death go. BUT he should let Dimitri's betrayls go. there is a difference between Death and Betrayl when someone dies you can't just do nothing. But when it's as silly as a rivalry It's just stupid.
Rockstar made this game violent. They didn't make it for sissy's like u who don't like to fight on it. Religion causes nothing but trouble, it the cause of all wars, bible bashers who are phychotics. Killing Darko doesn't help, Killing Dimitri in Revenge does. Niko feels relieved. Niko knew Darko was nothing, a waste of space, but Dimitri was capable of causing tradgedy. In Deal, he knows he should have took revenge when he could, and Niko being Niko would have done. So u are saying Dimitri's betrayl is nothing serious just silly. So CJ shouldn't have killed Ryder and Smoke, Tommy shouldn't have killed Lance and Sonny, Claude and Catalina. Yeah sure...why dont u just say the GTA series is silly cause that whats is all about.
Are u serious? Niko kills dimitri either way U call me a sissy? Yet i know more about this game than u ever will (You haven't noticed on our other debate) GTA is not about killing and stealing that is why u know nothing about it. U don't seem to understand my points. Dimitri is very serious BUT holding grudges is silly. U KNOW THIS IS TRUE! Why do u feel the need to call me a sissy and an idiot or moron? u can't come up with anything else to say? Shame you actually think your wining this LOL! Dimitri is a waste of space just as much as darko u even said he would let darko go.
No lad u know nowhere near as much as u think u do. If u said that GTA is not about killing and stealing to anyone they would laugh in your face. It has a story but that is the gameplay. Holding grudges is silly? Then what a silly ending that was to a silly game. U halfwit. I Know u are a sissy because u said u are against the violence in GTA. And first u say Dimitri is very serious then a waste of time, make ur mind up. Letting go of Darko go has nothing to do with Dimitri. Dimitri is the sheer opposite of Darko in terms of threat. And I am winning this.
If it was just about killing and stealing there wouldn't need to be a story did u think about that? I am against violence IN REAL LIFE but in a video game it's just clean fun. Brits no nothing of american games so i am bound to know more than u about this. Niko hates darko more than Dimitri that is no mystery. Dimitri is a waste of time But when he kills roman THAT'S SERIOUS!
u THINK you wining this but really? If that were the case WHY AM I STILL HERE! YOU WON NOTHING!
It's a story but it ivolves someone who kills and steals. There. Brits know nothing about American games? WTF Kind of crap is that. It isnt an american game. Set in America, features a Serb nad it was developed in Scotland by ROCKSTAR NORTH, in the UK, with input from R* NY, the main dev is North. When he kills Roman Dimitri becomes serious, so not when he betrays him or kidnkapped his cousin and Niko swears to bring him down. Ok, neither of us are winning, because neither one of us is turning the other. But U actually do think u are winning. If this was about who can give the best reasons though, i would be winning, Because YOURS ARE SHIT!!!!! Whoever else is in doubt about which of the endings is more realistic, if they read this they would see that revenge was right. Niko hates Darko, but sees the state he is in, in a way, He lets Darko live because he will suffer more alive, because Darko wanted to die, so really Niko letting him live shows he wants him to carry on suffering, that tells u what Niko is like.
I never said i was winning. You say Niko swears to bring him down HE DOES THIS EITHER WAY you are not getting my point. How are u giving the best reasons? Here some of your reasons and i will anwser them with my reasons.
1. Niko wouldn't work with dimitri.- How do you know Niko didn't try to put Dimitri's betrayls behind him? 2. Niko would want to kill Dimitri- Roman is more important helping than Killing Dimitri, Darko was not worth it CERTINTLY dimitri wasn't. 3. Niko loves Kate and would want her respect- Niko isn't even involved with kate first off and she even said she barely knew Niko. Why would he care so much about her respect?
4. Dimitri deserves to die- Simple DIMITRI DIES EITHER WAY!
5. Roman is just an idiot- if that were true why does niko even care about what happens to him?
6. Niko don't care about money- Than why does he do jobs for assholes?
7. Killing Dimitri would free Niko- You and i both know that didn't happen, and niko just wasted his time. 8. Revenge is more realistic- How is that possible when there almost the same? Not one ending is more realistic than the other.
9. Niko Wants to be with Kate- Again They are Not an item.
10. Revenge holds to niko's morals- What about niko's other morals? "revenge would not somehow shut the book" "Those that die get closure...the living do not" why would he want to give dimitri closure?" "need to do what you can to get by".
Now I will explain them. I am getting your point and it doesn't make sense because Niko wants Dimitri gone, and deal he is willing to leave him for money he doesn't need. Nonsense.
Niko never did put Dimitri behind him. everytime Dimitri called him Niko promised he would not get away with it.
Niko wants to be with Kate and vice versa, go on all her dates u will see. Of course he wants her to respect him, they aren't an item, but Kate wants to know she can trust him.
You are just saying Dimitri dies either way, but in deal, Niko thinks he is just getting the money and letting Dimitri live. So at the time, Niko would kill him first chance.
Roman is an idiot, Niko says that, but i think my brother is an idiot but that doesn't mean i dont care what happens to him. Niko does the jobs for money for assholes cause its easy, he can do it.
Lol Niko did not waste his time killing Dimitri on the ship. Don't say i know that because u know that Niko wouldn't take deal.
U went on about Deal being longer, better and all that, now u say they are almost the same. Yes, They are almost the same, gameplay wise, but storywise, Niko would take revenge.
Revenge does hold to Niko's morals of self-respect, dignity and his principle. Deal is going back on it all. Revenge did shut the book until Pegorino crashed the wedding. Niko killed Dimitri, allowing him to live normally with Kate. They officially become an item at the wedding, do u listen to their conversation on the way there.
Niko does not see killing as giving somebody closure. He sees it as a worthy punishment. And Dimitri needed punishing, and the only punishment was death. Dimitri was scared of dying, begging Niko not to do it, which just fuels Niko's delight in killing that scum.
Darko actually wanted to die, so Niko let him live, so he could suffer more, that is his revenge on Darko.
Did u notice Dimitri gets punished either way? NIKO DOES IN FACT SEE KILLING SOMEONE AS CLOSURE, LISTEN TO NIKO AND ROMAN'S CONVERSATION IN THAT SPECIAL SOMEONE IF U SPARE. In fact it's even on here on GTA WIKI that was actually one of niko's famous lines. That's why he would have let darko live cause death would have gave him closure. Deal holds to niko's morals even more so. DO YOU EVEN PAY ATTENTION TO THE DIALOGUE. They become an item at the wedding for like what...5 min How can he "Love" her when it only lasted so shortly. Kate even says in that mission that she barely knew niko. Revenge didn't shut the book Did u happen to notice what happend at the wedding? LOL Niko didn't kill dimitri to be freely with kate or to get him off he and roman's back he didn't for shere revenge thats why it's called revenge not living freely with kate. Niko did it forhimself and himself alone. Which was pretty selfish wouldn't u think? Not thinking about helping Roman nor Mallorie nor himself. Niko actually did agree to do the deal until he learned of dimitri's location, He also says to Kate "It would make things easier..for me and for roman" Niko did not do the deal for himself he didn't to help his cousin, even if that meant going back on an oath. Niko always bitches and complains about killing people all the time but feel he has to, but when the revenge/deal choice comes along u can make niko stop killing as he wishes. and not choose to give Dimitri closure...why would you want to do that? And don't tell me it's not giving him closure niko says it himself "Living is not easy" "Those that die get closure..the living do not".- Niko Bellic.
Dimitri dies either way? From a story point of view, Niko thinks he is letting Dimitri live in deal, and he wouldn't do that. Niko lets Darko live because he will suffer more alive. Why the hell does he thank Niko if he kills him. He finds no closure in killing Darko. ARE U STUPID!!!!!! HE DOES NOT KILL DIMITRI TO GIVE HIMSELF COLSURE!! OR TO GIVE DIMITRI CLOSURE!!! I cannot believe u said that. So at the end of deal, he avenges Roman to give Dimitri closure?????? That is what u are saying and it is complete nonsense lad. Every guy Niko kills is to give them closure!! He says that those who die get closure because they are DEAD!! But that isn't his reason for killing Dimitri. Does he kill Vlad to give him closure too??
He kills Dimitri because he is just a traitor! He was tracking Darko for 10 YEARS!! He killed Dimitri for revenge, which is just what Niko would do. He calls Kate to tell her because he knows that Kate will understand how he has given up the life and will be with him. Why is it Kate and Roman that give him advice. They are the two most important people to him in the city. But Kate is serious, Roman is silly. He does say that to kate about money making things easier, but Kate tells him he doesn't need it. A smart person would understan and kill Dimitri there and then, Niko is smart, that is what he'd do. Deal goes against alll your reasons, Niko always takes revenge, if he was changed, he would not avenge Roman, but Niko takes revenge, he doesn't change, America doesn't change him, it just shows him that he will always be a killer, but can still live normally, Kate shows him that.
Niko realizes death gives closure in That Special Someone but he didn't kill dimitri at the end to get revenge for himself he did it for roman and roman alone. You can't seem to understand kate and niko aren't together so i won't say it again. Niko does in fact change in deal let me explain why that is. Since the beginning of the game Niko was pretty simple always content on killing people, but in choosing deal he TRIED to change but he couldn't stop killing cause of roman's death. But he is still is a different person at the end of the game. He says in the deal ending "Why do i have to keep killing" that's showing he doesn't want to kill people but is doing it alll for roman more than himself, Dimitri was roman's killer and niko could not let that go as he says "There are some things we don't have a choice about" In revenge we face a completly different situation and a message if anything. Look at niko's face after he shoots pegorino...He slowly lowers the ak-47, showing his distaste of killing people, and his face just reads, sad and confused that's showing not cause of kate's death but because he could not change he is still the same person he was at the beginning always content on killing people. That's why he says "I Don't Know" saying POSSIBLY i am not sure if i won, cause the true victory would be to atleast try to change which he doesn't do in revenge. In deal he changes He is not the same as he was at the beginning, in the end he tried to stop killing but is pulled back into it cause of roman's death. But he still managed to change. What Niko would do is CHANGE that's what he wanted all along that's what roman tought him all along "There is no time for revenge" as roman would put it. This is why in deal he does not say "I Don't Know" cause in a way he did win, Niko says NOTHING MORE after jacob tells him he won, a good indicater that maybe Niko agrees. Like i said above in revenge when roman tells niko he did it niko responds with "I Suppose so" or "I Don't Know" niko is not sure of the so called "victory" in revenge. In revenge niko does not change America has meant nothing special to him, cause he's the same way he was at the beginning. In deal he was able to atleast try to stop killing and taking revenge. As he finally realized Revenge just ate him up and could not allow that to happen again he says it himself in "A Revenger's Tragedy" "I Let revenge eat up EVERYTHING good in me..i cannot allow that to happen again"- Niko Bellic
Kate and Niko get together at the end, just because people are not together doesn't mean they don't want to be, that is what u cannot get into ur head. Niko doesnt change in deal. Everything he has lived for, his pride, morals and self respect are lost in deal. In Deal, Niko loses. His cousin is dead because he took a silly risk instead of kill Dimitri when he had the chance. Niko says "I suppose so" when roman says they can start making money. I understand that because in deal he is taking a chance, that could possibly just see him get money and not kill again....BUT, Niko as a character knew that he didn't need the money, and he isn't someone who betrays himself, because Deal betrays himself. When i played the Deal ending, i thought that everything i have learned about Niko has just been crushed, his self-respect, and his morals of personal pride. In a way, that is the point of the two endings:
In Deal, Niko takes a chance to stop killing, because he wants to, but goes back on his own principles and loses the respect of the girl that understood him. He regets not takng revenge earlier, because now he has no choice but to take revenge after Roman is killed.
In Revenge, Niko realizes that Dimitri must be killed, he does it for himself, but his intentions are not to be selfish. He understood that money cannot buy the life he wants. He is glad that Dimitri is no longer a worry, and that killing him was the end, thats why he says "It ended where it began". Kate finally accepts him and he is at lat happy...until his actions have consequences when Pegorino kills Kate. Niko knows he will always be a killer, there is no escape from his past. All he can do is kill Pegorino and hope that he can live with it.
Well i know is my point was stronly made i can clearly justify deal better you can say u justify revenge better all u want but i know the truth. I think i hammered u with my text above since i am sick of saying the same thing over and over u can just keep reading my text above u clearly can't top it with saying stuff like he betrays himself in deal u will have to do better than that. You are highly unarmed. DOWN FOR THE COUNT! 1, 2, 3,
Lol u are just copying what i said about being able to justify points better. Your reasons are weak boy! Most of them u got off Destructoid which is the most biased and wrong article ever. What a FAIL By yourself!! I have destroyed ur point, i should go up against someone who actually knows GTA. Niko would pick revenge because that is what he's like, u know it deep down, EVERYONE KNOWS IT'S REVENGE!!! U, my yankee friend, are well and truly OUT!!!
Anyway, to bring a conclusion to this conversation, I will not be looking at this page ever again. So i will never know what u wrote. If i did see it, i will only just want to destroy u some more, but i won this a while ago when I left u trailing behind, trying and failing to match my top level reasons.
Anything u write on my talk page will be automatically removed without me even seeing it. I have clearly owned u with my superiority of GTA knowledge. U have a lot of learning and catching up to do lad, and i am bored of proving time and time again how much more i know than u do, which is basically everything. Don't worry, if u pay full attention to the story, u might just understand it. I gave u a chance to finish this a while ago, but now i am the bigger man and i am ending this by drawing a line under it. U LOST!!! I WON!!!! (To anyone else, this ended here)
First of all, these edit wars you two are having, which involve hundreds of edits, are totally annaceptable. We have no proof weather deal or revenge are canon and you can't just abuse each other and start edit wars just because you think you are right. If this type of edit warring and flaming continues then a block may result. This is a final warning to both of you. If one more edit war ensues between you two then the staff will be forced to take action. You have been warned Chimpso (Talk) 07:24, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
we just want that part about the canon ending deleted it does nothing but cause trouble. and since neither ending is canon than it really shouldn't be there.
RE: Edit Warring
we are not warring anymore BUT could one of u administrators PLEASE get rid of that part were it talks about the canon ending...since there is no canon ending than it's pretty useless for that to be there wouldn't you guys think?
Character's Favourite Radio Stations
When you are in there car (Mainly in San Andreas) A certain radio station is always playing.