Wikia

GTA Wiki

Changes: GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion

View source

Back to page

(Active requests)
 
(1,094 intermediate revisions by 53 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:::'''<font color=red>There is currently a full set of Admins, so requests for promotion to Patroller only.</font>'''
 
 
 
Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.
 
Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.
   
 
You may apply for Rollback Rights or Administrator privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.
 
You may apply for Rollback Rights or Administrator privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.
   
Requests for Oversight and Checkuser must be done at Wikia Central (and they'll probably be declined).
+
{{RfP|Patroller|3}}
   
'''Rollback''' is a tool that allows users to quickly revert vandalism.
+
Requests for [[w:c:help:Help:CheckUser|Checkuser]] and [[wp:Wikipedia:Revision deletion|Revision Delete]] must be done at Community Central (and they will probably be declined).
  +
  +
'''Patrollers''' are given the '''Rollback''' tool that allows users to quickly revert vandalism. They are also given '''Chat moderator''' rights that allow them to kick and ban users from the wiki's chat.
   
 
'''Administrators''' have the power to block and ban users, protect pages, move images, and delete pages and images, in addition to rollback.
 
'''Administrators''' have the power to block and ban users, protect pages, move images, and delete pages and images, in addition to rollback.
   
To qualify for rollback rights, editors must have been active for two months with no rules violations. Rollbackers must receive a 60% 'yes' percentage to be promoted.
+
To qualify for rollback rights, editors must have been active for two months with no rules violations. Rollbackers must receive a 60% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Users who apply within three months of joining will face a three month probationary period. This may also apply in situations such as inexperience or users who were previously demoted. At the end of the three months a review will be made by Bureaucrats and Administrators to determine whether or not the user will retain their rights.
   
To qualify for administrator rights, editors must have been active for four months with no rules violations. Administrators must receive a 70% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Those applying for adminship will likely be asked questions on how they deal with certain situations. This is to see if a user has the capabilities of being an administrator.
+
To qualify for administrator rights, editors must have been active patrollers for four months with no rule violations. Administrators must receive a 70% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Those applying for adminship will likely be asked questions on how they deal with certain situations. This is to see if a user has the capabilities of being an administrator.
   
 
Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.
 
Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.
   
When applying for promotion, a ''community vote'' will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at sysop discretion.
+
When applying for promotion, a ''community vote'' will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at bureaucrat discretion. Only bureaucrats should close votes.
   
 
Application users who are caught tampering with other users votes, such as changing a no to a yes, will have their request closed immediately.
 
Application users who are caught tampering with other users votes, such as changing a no to a yes, will have their request closed immediately.
Line 27: Line 25:
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2011-12]]
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2011-12]]
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2013]]
 
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2013]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Jan 2014 Administrator Election]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2014]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2014-15]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests Early 2015]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/July 2015 Administrator Election]]
  +
*[[GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion/Archived Requests 2015-16]]
   
==Active requests==
+
==Active Requests==
+
==Inactive Requests==
===Kingrhem - Patroller===
 
 
Hi, my name is Kingrhem, and I'm requesting to be a patroller on this wiki. I have + 1200 edits, and I've been active on this wiki for two months. I started to take lessons at [[wp:Linguaphone (company)|Linguaphone]] to improve my English. And I know a-lot about coding templates. I'm trying to be friendly with everyone. And don't forget that I know a-lot about the GTA Series. [[User:Kingrhem|<font face= "Impact" color ="lightgreen" >Kingrhem</font>]] [[User talk:Kingrhem|<sup>'''Talk'''</sup>]] <sup>or</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Kingrhem|<sup>'''Don't talk'''</sup>]] 13:38, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
====Votes====
 
*'''Yes''' - [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 16:09, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Yes''' - '''[[User:Ilan xd|ILan]] (<small>[[User talk:Ilan xd|XD]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Ilan xd|Edits]] &bull; [[w:c:rockstargames|Home]] </small>)''' 16:23, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Yes''' - <span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black">[[User:Dodo8|Dodo8]]</span> [[User talk:Dodo8|<sup>''<span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black>Talk</span>''</sup>]]
 
*'''Yes - [[User:Sasquatch101|Sasquatch101]] ([[User talk:Sasquatch101|talk]]) 02:30, July 16, 2013 (UTC)'''
 
*'''Yes''' - --'''[[User:Thomas0802|Thomas0802]] ([[User talk:Thomas0802|talk]]-[[Special:Contributions/Thomas0802|Edits]])''' 22:00, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
====Comments====
 
*You've been active here, your English is gradually upgrading, you create good templates...my vote is a "'''Yes'''", but I think the patroller number limit's been reached, so I'm not sure if you, or anyone else can be promoted to patroller, at the time. - [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 16:09, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
*We have room for one more <strike>admin</strike> patroller, as Bob is currently inactive. Helpful edits and good attitude makes this one an easy "Yes" for me. -- '''[[User:Ilan xd|ILan]] (<small>[[User talk:Ilan xd|XD]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Ilan xd|Edits]] &bull; [[w:c:rockstargames|Home]] </small>)''' 16:23, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
**Even easier, then. The behaviour's been good too, so I don't see a problem. - [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 17:18, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
***I think you meant "patroller", Ilan. Voting '''Yes''', although I consider you should have waited a few more weeks, Kingrhem.<span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black">[[User:Dodo8|Dodo8]]</span> [[User talk:Dodo8|<sup>''<span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black>Talk</span>''</sup>]]
 
****Oh, shit. Thanks. -- '''[[User:Ilan xd|ILan]] (<small>[[User talk:Ilan xd|XD]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Ilan xd|Edits]] &bull; [[w:c:rockstargames|Home]] </small>)''' 19:40, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
*You seem to be well qualified for the job. Your active a lot and your english is good too. So it's a "yes" for me. [[User:Sasquatch101|Sasquatch101]] ([[User talk:Sasquatch101|talk]]) 02:30, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
*I actually agree with Mikey idea, in those last months few users have joined the Wikia and they put a lot of work on it, they have too very experience (no citing names). After Bob is currently inactive, a free place remains for a new patroller. You Kingrhem, you have nice editing skills, you are very active, you add real information and you know a lot about GTA Series, so I know you're qualified enough. Like you're now the first of the normal users who candidate yourself, I'm voting Yes. --'''[[User:Thomas0802|Thomas0802]] ([[User talk:Thomas0802|talk]]-[[Special:Contributions/Thomas0802|Edits]])''' 22:00, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
==Inactive requests==
 
===Kingrhem - Patroller===
 
 
::Closed 17:44, June 17, 2013 (UTC) as '''<font color=red>Unsuccessful</font>''' - <b>[[User:McJeff|Jeff]]</b> ([[User_talk:McJeff|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|stalk]])
 
 
Hi, My name is Kingrhem and I'm asking for Patroller rights to make this wiki clean from any errors . I have a hundred edits on this wiki, my grammar is very good and I have been a active for about month. I'm available for 10 hours a day. And I know a-lot about the GTA Series.[[User:Kingrhem|Kingrhem]] ([[User talk:Kingrhem|talk]]) 14:03, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
====Votes====
 
*'''No''' - <b>[[User:McJeff|Jeff]]</b> ([[User_talk:McJeff|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|stalk]])
 
*'''No '''- [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 21:04, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Absolutely Not''' - [[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 21:56, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Not Qualified''' - [[User:Tony 1998|Mr. T., That&#39;s Me!]] ([[User talk:Tony 1998|talk]]) 00:02, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''No '''- [[User:Boomer8|Boomer8]] ([[User talk:Boomer8|talk]]) 05:49, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
====Discussion====
 
*One month and 100 edits isn't enough to qualify someone for patroller on a high-activity wiki like this one. Three months and 500 edits maybe. <b>[[User:McJeff|Jeff]]</b> ([[User_talk:McJeff|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/McJeff|stalk]]) 14:18, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*I think you'd have more chances if you applied next month with at least 500 edits. I don't think you need three months as long as you edit frequently and make substantial edits (just adding categories won't get you far). - [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 21:08, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*As below, with the request that also failed, you haven't been on here long enough. I agree with McJeff in that I don't think you're worthy for promotion until you've been on here for about three months. Also, your grammar doesn't appear to be quite as good as you say; even your request paragraph has a few errors that, if I saw them on an information page, I would cringe at and take time to correct. Try again later in the year. - [[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 22:01, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*Around 250 to 400 edits are enough to meet Patroller prerequisites, but they need to be good quality edits, not just adding a letters to a word or commenting on blogs. Don't go AWOL after you read this and edit a lot and try to apply again because that will show that you just want the position without any reasons. Keep up the good edits and help. Try to apply again in a month or so. [[User:Tony 1998|Mr. T., That&#39;s Me!]] ([[User talk:Tony 1998|talk]]) 00:02, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
*If you get some more edits under your belt, improve your grammar, and reaply in a month or so, you'll have a chance of becoming a patroller on the GTA Wiki. [[User:Boomer8|Boomer8]] ([[User talk:Boomer8|talk]]) 05:49, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
===Instulent===
 
 
::Closed, June 9, 2013 as '''<font color=red>Unsuccessful</font>''' - <font size="+1.5" face="Trajan Pro"><b>[[User:The Tom|Tom]]</b></font> [[User talk:The Tom|<sup><u>Talk</u></sup>]] 08:58, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen, my name is Instulent and I would like to be promoted as a patroller on the GTA Wiki. I've been on this wiki for almost a month, have done 1,100+ edits and counting and not one day with out editing. I have reported a few people who have either trolled etc to admins and I get along well with almost everyone on this wiki. I am a positive person who will do anything to a help a wiki out. Thank you for your time. [[User:Instulent|Instulent]] ([[User talk:Instulent|talk]]) 17:58, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
====Votes====
 
*'''No''' - <font size="+1.5" face="Trajan Pro"><b>[[User:The Tom|Tom]]</b></font> [[User talk:The Tom|<sup><u>Talk</u></sup>]] 07:41, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''No''' ''(not now)'' - <span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black">[[User:Dodo8|Dodo8]]</span> [[User talk:Dodo8|<sup>''<span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black>Talk</span>''</sup>]]
 
*'''Computer says no''' - [[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 09:40, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Not Yet '''- [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 10:39, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''No''' - [[User:Messi1983|Messi1983]] ([[User talk:Messi1983|talk]]) 23:08, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Maybe''' - [[User:Cloudkit01|Cloudkit01]] ([[User talk:Cloudkit01|talk]]) 00:21, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''YES- [[User:Sasquatch101|Sasquatch101]] ([[User talk:Sasquatch101|talk]]) 02:21, June 3, 2013 (UTC)'''
 
*'''Recuse'''- [[User:Tony 1998|Mr. T., That&#39;s Me!]] ([[User talk:Tony 1998|talk]]) 04:00, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''No''' - --'''[[User:Thomas0802|Thomas0802]] ([[User talk:Thomas0802|talk]]-[[Special:Contributions/Thomas0802|Edits]])''' 19:41, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Yes''' - [[User:Boomer8|Boomer8]] ([[User talk:Boomer8|talk]]) 05:04, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
====Comments====
 
*I'm certain you'd make a very good patroller. But does the red text at the top of the page not hinder your chances somewhat? --[[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 09:37, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
:*I forgot to remove that. Due to the inactivity of a patroller there is an available place. <font size="+1.5" face="Trajan Pro"><b>[[User:The Tom|Tom]]</b></font> [[User talk:The Tom|<sup><u>Talk</u></sup>]] 07:41, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
::*OK, that's fine, ta. - [[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 09:50, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
*Almost a month is not long enough, you're doing a good job though. Keep it up and apply again in a two months or so. <font size="+1.5" face="Trajan Pro"><b>[[User:The Tom|Tom]]</b></font> [[User talk:The Tom|<sup><u>Talk</u></sup>]] 07:41, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
*You're doing a great job, but you still have some things to learn. Try again in a month or so.<span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black">[[User:Dodo8|Dodo8]]</span> [[User talk:Dodo8|<sup>''<span style="color:#FF6600; font-family:Cooper Black>Talk</span>''</sup>]]
 
*Sadly it's still a no. An employer wouldn't promote an employee just three weeks after starting so it's the same principle here. - [[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 09:43, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
*I agree. Some more weeks will give you more chances. Your work has been great, so far, but you need some more time to consolidate and run for patrollership again. If you wait 2-3 weeks, I might vote "'''Yes'''", the next time, Instu. - [[User:Mikey Klebbitz|Mikey Klebbitz]] ([[User talk:Mikey Klebbitz|talk]]) 10:43, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
*It is a good idea to wait on an editor who has just started out and may not be fully commited. However, in your case you seem to be very much into bettering the GTA Wiki. Your grammar and overall skills are what fit the patroller title; so I don't belive it's necessary to wait a month on a perfectly good editor. [[User:Sasquatch101|Sasquatch101]] ([[User talk:Sasquatch101|talk]]) 02:21, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
*He is a great editor, but I noticed some of his edits on info and images have fanon-like wordings. Despite I told him and Tom that a Patroller spot is open, I'm going to avoid voting because saying a no doesn't feel right to me nor does saying a "yes" because of his somewhat "fanon-phrases" on pages and image captions. {{unsigned|Tony 1998}}
 
*User has only been here a short time, hence why I have voted no for the time being. [[User:Messi1983|Messi1983]] ([[User talk:Messi1983|talk]]) 03:20, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
*However the number of edits doesn't matter, what matter to be a standard is how your edits are useful ( for example not adding a comma or something like this ) and remember, you did good edits and uploaded images in these times, your activity is too ok, but it's all about the time, wait a little and you can ask again. --'''[[User:Thomas0802|Thomas0802]] ([[User talk:Thomas0802|talk]]-[[Special:Contributions/Thomas0802|Edits]])''' 19:44, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
 
*The result and the reason behind it seems pretty unanimous. D'you reckon it might be worth getting rid of this and postponing the vote to a later date? Providing Instulent stays committed and keeps his editing up to scratch, I'm sure there'll be a few more yeses after a while. Just not now. -[[User:NikoBellicsBoss11|NikoBellicsBoss11]] ([[User talk:NikoBellicsBoss11|talk]]) 20:28, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
 
*You have a ton of edits, you're active, and you seem like a nice guy; everything a patroller should have. So I've voted"yes".  [[User:Boomer8|Boomer8]] ([[User talk:Boomer8|talk]]) 05:04, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 21:49, April 14, 2016

Welcome to GTA Wiki:Requests for Promotion.

You may apply for Rollback Rights or Administrator privileges on this noticeboard. To do so, you must meet the prerequisites, and then state what position you are looking for and why you think you need the rollback and/or administrator tools.

RFPVacancy

There are currently

3
Patroller
positions open.

Please apply below if you are interested.

RFPVacancy


Requests for Checkuser and Revision Delete must be done at Community Central (and they will probably be declined).

Patrollers are given the Rollback tool that allows users to quickly revert vandalism. They are also given Chat moderator rights that allow them to kick and ban users from the wiki's chat.

Administrators have the power to block and ban users, protect pages, move images, and delete pages and images, in addition to rollback.

To qualify for rollback rights, editors must have been active for two months with no rules violations. Rollbackers must receive a 60% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Users who apply within three months of joining will face a three month probationary period. This may also apply in situations such as inexperience or users who were previously demoted. At the end of the three months a review will be made by Bureaucrats and Administrators to determine whether or not the user will retain their rights.

To qualify for administrator rights, editors must have been active patrollers for four months with no rule violations. Administrators must receive a 70% 'yes' percentage to be promoted. Those applying for adminship will likely be asked questions on how they deal with certain situations. This is to see if a user has the capabilities of being an administrator.

Editors with rollback and administrator experience on other wikis are encouraged to apply, and based on the editor in question exceptions may be made to the length of time editing required for promotion.

When applying for promotion, a community vote will take place. Voting lasts 7 days, although it may be allowed to run shorter (in the case of an obvious pass/fail) or longer (in the case of a very close vote) at bureaucrat discretion. Only bureaucrats should close votes.

Application users who are caught tampering with other users votes, such as changing a no to a yes, will have their request closed immediately.

Please submit your requests at the top of the "Active requests" page subsection.

Requests where the voting has finished can be found at

Active RequestsEdit

Inactive RequestsEdit

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki